A Where can I find a text about heavy elements migration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the migration of heavy siderophile elements, particularly molybdenum, during Earth's formation, specifically how they tend to sink into the core when the planet was molten. The user seeks broader sources discussing this phenomenon, noting that while some articles address molybdenum's concentration in the mantle and crust, they lack comprehensive insights on element migration during the planet's early molten state. Participants reference the iron catastrophe and the late heavy bombardment as significant events influencing the distribution of heavy elements. There is a debate about the complexity of the issue, with some arguing that the sinking of dense elements should be straightforward. Additionally, there is curiosity about whether volcanic activity can bring up heavier elements from deeper layers compared to meteoric sources.
Guilherme Franco
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Let me be more specific:

I'm needing some source that talks, in a more broad way, about how heavier elements tend to "sink into the core" during Earth's formation (when we're talking about siderophile elements, that readily combine with molten iron). Wikipedia's page about the Goldschmidt classification comments that but assigns no specific source to that claim.

My particular interest is about Molydenum, which is siderophile, and I found articles talking about its concentration in Earth's mantle and crust and about what was expected of it.

But I can't manage to find any more broad comments on the question of heavy siderophile elements tending to "sink" during Earth's formation when it's still mostly molten rock.

I need this just to serve as a reference to this comment.

I've even downloaded some books on astrophysics of planet formation, but they don't talk about the particular question of element migration after the rocky planet has been just formed and is still hot enough to have molten rock on the surface.

Thanks by the help!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Let me try something. You are talking about the iron catastrophe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_catastrophe

1. the entire planet became molten, so why would orther dense elements not sink as well?
Densities
iron: 7.874 g/cm3 and Nickel: 8.903g/cm3
Mo: 10.28g/cm3
2. Consider the late heavy bombardment which is thought to have bought many of the current crustal heavy elements to earth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Heavy_Bombardment

So I think you are making something straightforward more complex than it needs to be.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
jim mcnamara said:
Let me try something. You are talking about the iron catastrophe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_catastrophe

1. the entire planet became molten, so why would orther dense elements not sink as well?
Densities
iron: 7.874 g/cm3 and Nickel: 8.903g/cm3
Mo: 10.28g/cm3
2. Consider the late heavy bombardment which is thought to have bought many of the current crustal heavy elements to earth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Heavy_Bombardment

So I think you are making something straightforward more complex than it needs to be.

I was just being specific about what I wanted to know. The question is just that, when looking with keywords associated with heavy element migration towards the core, I didn't found any of this.

Now, another question if you know: Does volcanic activity bring up material from layers deep enough to have a greater richness of heavy elements than the crust? Or are meteors a more important source?

Thanks!
 
jim mcnamara said:
1. the entire planet became molten, so why would orther dense elements not sink as well?
Densities
iron: 7.874 g/cm3 and Nickel: 8.903g/cm3
Mo: 10.28g/cm3
The density of trace elements is irrelevant. All that matters is their solubilities.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top