Where can I find a text about heavy elements migration?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the migration of heavy siderophile elements, particularly Molybdenum, during Earth's formation, specifically addressing their tendency to sink into the core. The concept of the iron catastrophe is highlighted, where the entire planet became molten, allowing denser elements to potentially sink. The late heavy bombardment is also mentioned as a significant event that contributed to the current distribution of heavy elements in Earth's crust. The conversation emphasizes the need for more comprehensive sources on the topic of heavy element migration in the context of planetary formation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of siderophile elements and their properties
  • Familiarity with the iron catastrophe theory
  • Knowledge of the late heavy bombardment and its implications
  • Basic concepts of planetary formation and molten rock dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the iron catastrophe and its effects on element distribution
  • Explore the late heavy bombardment and its role in delivering heavy elements
  • Investigate the solubility of trace elements in molten rock
  • Examine volcanic activity's role in bringing up deep Earth materials
USEFUL FOR

Geologists, planetary scientists, and researchers interested in the formation of Earth and the behavior of heavy elements during planetary development.

Guilherme Franco
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Let me be more specific:

I'm needing some source that talks, in a more broad way, about how heavier elements tend to "sink into the core" during Earth's formation (when we're talking about siderophile elements, that readily combine with molten iron). Wikipedia's page about the Goldschmidt classification comments that but assigns no specific source to that claim.

My particular interest is about Molydenum, which is siderophile, and I found articles talking about its concentration in Earth's mantle and crust and about what was expected of it.

But I can't manage to find any more broad comments on the question of heavy siderophile elements tending to "sink" during Earth's formation when it's still mostly molten rock.

I need this just to serve as a reference to this comment.

I've even downloaded some books on astrophysics of planet formation, but they don't talk about the particular question of element migration after the rocky planet has been just formed and is still hot enough to have molten rock on the surface.

Thanks by the help!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Let me try something. You are talking about the iron catastrophe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_catastrophe

1. the entire planet became molten, so why would orther dense elements not sink as well?
Densities
iron: 7.874 g/cm3 and Nickel: 8.903g/cm3
Mo: 10.28g/cm3
2. Consider the late heavy bombardment which is thought to have bought many of the current crustal heavy elements to earth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Heavy_Bombardment

So I think you are making something straightforward more complex than it needs to be.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
jim mcnamara said:
Let me try something. You are talking about the iron catastrophe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_catastrophe

1. the entire planet became molten, so why would orther dense elements not sink as well?
Densities
iron: 7.874 g/cm3 and Nickel: 8.903g/cm3
Mo: 10.28g/cm3
2. Consider the late heavy bombardment which is thought to have bought many of the current crustal heavy elements to earth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Heavy_Bombardment

So I think you are making something straightforward more complex than it needs to be.

I was just being specific about what I wanted to know. The question is just that, when looking with keywords associated with heavy element migration towards the core, I didn't found any of this.

Now, another question if you know: Does volcanic activity bring up material from layers deep enough to have a greater richness of heavy elements than the crust? Or are meteors a more important source?

Thanks!
 
jim mcnamara said:
1. the entire planet became molten, so why would orther dense elements not sink as well?
Densities
iron: 7.874 g/cm3 and Nickel: 8.903g/cm3
Mo: 10.28g/cm3
The density of trace elements is irrelevant. All that matters is their solubilities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K