Where can I find pre-made blank graphs for 3-D graphing in Algebra II?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kurushio95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Graphing
kurushio95
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Algebra II-- 3-D Graphing

my algebra II class is getting into 3-D graphing and i need help. can anyone tell me where to find some pre-made blank graphs? it takes me too long to draw them by hand and interferes with my tests.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"pre-made blank graphs" - what exactly is that? Do you mean you are looking for a picture of 3D Cartesian axes?
 
if your not afraid to waste ink just make it your self...use paint or something.
 
What do you mean by "blank graphs"? Surely it's not that difficult to draw three lines for the axes!
 
it's just that when i do it, i usually have to do one graph three or four times because it becomes too cluttered to make anything out. i guess i could make some on my own, i'll give it a try
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top