Where can I find the image charge for a point charge near conducting surfaces?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding image charges for a point charge near conducting surfaces. For the first problem involving two semi-infinite grounded conducting planes, the image charges are correctly identified at the coordinates (-40,40), (-40,-40), and (40,-40), totaling three charges in different quadrants. The second problem, concerning a point charge near a conducting sphere, requires understanding the symmetry of the sphere to determine the position of the image charge. The key principle is that image charges must have opposite signs to maintain zero potential at the conducting surfaces. Further clarification on exploiting symmetry for the sphere is requested to solve the second problem.
Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
Someone's got to help me on these two.

1)Two semi-infinite grounded conducting planes meet at right angles. In the region between them, a point charge q is kept such that it is at a distance of 40cm from each of the two planes[i.e.(40,40)]. Find the position of its image charge/charges.

2)A point charge q is placed in the vicinity of a conducting sphere. Find the poition of its image charge.

Just in case...An image charge will produce zero potential together with q.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reshma said:
Someone's got to help me on these two.

1)Two semi-infinite grounded conducting planes meet at right angles. In the region between them, a point charge q is kept such that it is at a distance of 40cm from each of the two planes[i.e.(40,40)]. Find the position of its image charge/charges.

2)A point charge q is placed in the vicinity of a conducting sphere. Find the poition of its image charge.

Just in case...An image charge will produce zero potential together with q.
Have you thought about what the optical image(s) would be if you placed an object in the symmetry plane between two mirrors at right angles? How many images would be formed, and where would they be? For charges, image charges must have the opposite sign to have constant (zero) potential at the surface. When multiples surfaces are involved there can be images of images, just as there are for optical images.
 
OlderDan said:
Have you thought about what the optical image(s) would be if you placed an object in the symmetry plane between two mirrors at right angles? How many images would be formed, and where would they be? For charges, image charges must have the opposite sign to have constant (zero) potential at the surface. When multiples surfaces are involved there can be images of images, just as there are for optical images.

Thank you very much! I think this solves my first problem.

Since my charge is located in the 1st quadrant, I should have one image charge in each of the other three quadrants(total=3). So by your explanation my image charges are located at (-40,40), (-40,-40), (40,-40). Is my answer correct?

However in the 2nd problem, I don't know how to exploit the symmetry for the sphere. Can you help me on that?
 
Can someone help?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top