Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the submission of a 15-page educational article on Lagrangian mechanics, focusing on where such a paper could be published. Participants explore the necessity of background research and the appropriateness of various journals for educational content in physics.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about suitable journals for submitting an educational article on Lagrangian mechanics.
- Another participant questions the author's claim of a "not completely standard" approach without prior research into existing educational literature.
- A participant suggests that reputable journals will not accept articles lacking background research and recommends reading existing literature before submission.
- Some participants propose specific journals such as "Physics Teacher" and "Physical Review Physics Education Research" as potential venues for publication.
- There is a suggestion that referencing existing literature can enhance the credibility of the paper and assist in the peer-review process.
- One participant expresses frustration at the advice given, indicating a desire for direct answers rather than critiques of their approach.
- A later reply acknowledges the tension between participants while recognizing the validity of both perspectives regarding the publication process.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the necessity of background research before submitting an article. While some emphasize the importance of referencing existing literature, others focus on the original question of where to submit the article. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to publication.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight the potential pitfalls of submitting work without adequate literature review, but specific limitations or assumptions regarding the educational approach are not fully explored.