Where Did I Go Wrong in Calculating the Charge's Movement?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the miscalculations made in determining the movement of a charge in an electric field. The user incorrectly used the elementary charge value, leading to an unrealistic speed exceeding the speed of light. Additionally, there were errors in calculating the time and distance the charge would move, particularly in the application of kinematic equations. The correct formula for vertical displacement should be y = 1/2 at² rather than y = at. Overall, the calculations need to be revisited to align with fundamental physics principles.
Jrads
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Given a charge -e moving through a set of charged plates at a velocity of 0.8 x10^7 m/s. The plates have a voltage of 4000v, how long can the plates be without the charge -e impacting one of them?
-e = -1.602 x 10^-6 C
Me = 9.11 x 10^-31 kg
Relevant Equations
E=v/d
F=qE=ma
Electric field between the plates
V=4x10^3
d=0.02
E=4x10^3/0.02
E=2x10^5 V/m

Calculate the force on charge -e
-e = -1.602x10^-6
Me = 9.11x10^-31
F=qE
F=(1.602x10^-6)(2x10^5)
F=0.3204 N

Using F=ma
a=F/Me
a=0.3204/9.11x10^-31
a=3.517x10^29 m/s

Time = distance / speed
T=.01 (half distance of plates with charge in the middle) / 3.517x10^29
T =2.84x10^-32 seconds

Calculate the distance the charge would move at 0.8x10^7 m/s in 2.84x10^-32 seconds

Distance = speed x time
Distance = 0.8x10^7 x 2.84x10^-32
Distance = 2.272x10-25 mtrs
I think I have royally screwed up my calculations somewhere here as a) the charge is moving substantially faster than the speed of light. And b) the length or distance seems really really small?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A few points to consider...

If 'e' is meant to be the elementary charge, then e = 1.602x10⁻¹⁹C, not 1.602x10⁻⁶C.

The particle (it may not be an electron) behaves like a simple projectile, with an initial horizonal velocity, in a gravitational field. Make sure you know how to do simple projectile calculations!

Watch out for careless mistakes. E.g the unit for acceleration is not m/s!
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and Delta2
Except the mistake regarding the value of acceleration due to the electric field, which mistake is due to wrong charge of electron as spotted by @Steve4Physics , you have done another mistake in calculating the time to move vertically from the middle up (or down) to the plate due to the electric field.

You should use the formula $$y=\frac{1}{2}at^2$$ and not $$y=at$$ which is the one you used (y=0.01 since that charge starts from middle).
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top