Where Did I Go Wrong in Calculating the Electric Field Between Capacitor Plates?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field between two parallel capacitor plates, each with a charge of 1nC and separated by 0.03m. The user initially used the formula δ/2ε₀ to find the electric field but expressed confusion about the role of the distance between the plates in their calculations. Responses clarified that for uniform fields, the distance does not affect the formula as long as fringe effects are negligible. The user confirmed their method of summing the contributions from both plates was correct. The conversation emphasizes understanding the assumptions behind the electric field calculations in capacitor problems.
vysero
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have browsed similar threads and have only found more confusion. My question is if I have two parallel plates with an area A = 1m^2 and they are separated by a distance d = .03m. Each has a charge of Q and -Q respectively where Q = 1nC. I want to find the electric field between the plates.[/B]

Homework Equations



The equation I used was from my textbook: δ/2ε˳[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



So I said that E(+) = 1nC/2(8.85x10^-12) and that E(tot) = 2(E(+)) = 112.99 n/c. However, this calculation does not take into account the distance between the two plates which I feel it should. Where have I gone wrong here?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would need to calculate the capacitance - and then use Q = CV.
 
You can calculate the field by going the route suggested by Svein, or by using the formula provided. The distance between the plates doesn't matter for the second method provided that the geometry of the capacitor allows the "field is uniform between plates" assumption to hold and what's called "fringe effects" can be neglected. This is almost always the case for problems that are assigned.
 
gneill said:
You can calculate the field by going the route suggested by Svein, or by using the formula provided. The distance between the plates doesn't matter for the second method provided that the geometry of the capacitor allows the "field is uniform between plates" assumption to hold and what's called "fringe effects" can be neglected. This is almost always the case for problems that are assigned.

Okay so where did I go wrong when using the provided formula? Or did I do that right?
 
Looks right to me. You summed the field contributions of the two plates.
 
gneill said:
Looks right to me. You summed the field contributions of the two plates.

Oh :P okay thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top