Where did I go wrong? [Laplace Transform]

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the Laplace Transform of the function f(t) = t^2 using the known transform of L[1] = 1/s. The user performs integration by parts twice, ultimately arriving at -2/s^3, but questions the negative sign in the result. They also explore the relationship between L[t^a * f(t)] and L[1], suggesting that L[t^2] can be derived using the second derivative of L[1]. The conclusion indicates that the correct result for L[t^2] is indeed 2/s^3, confirming the approach taken.
mathwurkz
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
L is Laplace Transform operator.
Question is:

Let f(t) = t^2. Derive L[f] from L[1]

So I know f(1) =1 and L[1] = \frac{1}{s}

Carrying out the Transform...

L[f] = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-st}t^2 dt

Integration by parts u = t^2, dv = e^{-st} dt

I do the integration, the uv terms go to zero. after I clean up I get

- \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-st}}{-s} 2t\ dt

Doing IBP again. u = t,\ dv = e^{-st} dt Rinse and repeat.

- \frac{2}{s} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-st}}{-s} (1) dt \\<br /> = - \frac{2}{s} \left( \frac{e^{-st}}{s^2}\right)_{0}^{\infty} = - \frac{2}{s^3}

Ok. So is that right? I don't think the negative is right at the end. But what the bigger thing that worries me is how do I use L[1] in this? Or is that a different approach?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems something like this is wanted
L[t^a \ f(t)]=\left(-\frac{d}{ds}\right)^aL[f]
thus
L[t^2]=L[t^2 \ 1]=\left(-\frac{d}{ds}\right)^2L[1]=\frac{d^2}{{ds}^2} \ \frac{1}{s}=\frac{2}{s^3}
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top