mathwurkz
- 41
- 0
L is Laplace Transform operator.
Question is:
Let f(t) = t^2. Derive L[f] from L[1]
So I know f(1) =1 and L[1] = \frac{1}{s}
Carrying out the Transform...
L[f] = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-st}t^2 dt
Integration by parts u = t^2, dv = e^{-st} dt
I do the integration, the uv terms go to zero. after I clean up I get
- \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-st}}{-s} 2t\ dt
Doing IBP again. u = t,\ dv = e^{-st} dt Rinse and repeat.
- \frac{2}{s} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-st}}{-s} (1) dt \\<br /> = - \frac{2}{s} \left( \frac{e^{-st}}{s^2}\right)_{0}^{\infty} = - \frac{2}{s^3}
Ok. So is that right? I don't think the negative is right at the end. But what the bigger thing that worries me is how do I use L[1] in this? Or is that a different approach?
Question is:
Let f(t) = t^2. Derive L[f] from L[1]
So I know f(1) =1 and L[1] = \frac{1}{s}
Carrying out the Transform...
L[f] = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-st}t^2 dt
Integration by parts u = t^2, dv = e^{-st} dt
I do the integration, the uv terms go to zero. after I clean up I get
- \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-st}}{-s} 2t\ dt
Doing IBP again. u = t,\ dv = e^{-st} dt Rinse and repeat.
- \frac{2}{s} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-st}}{-s} (1) dt \\<br /> = - \frac{2}{s} \left( \frac{e^{-st}}{s^2}\right)_{0}^{\infty} = - \frac{2}{s^3}
Ok. So is that right? I don't think the negative is right at the end. But what the bigger thing that worries me is how do I use L[1] in this? Or is that a different approach?
Last edited: