Where does a field line meet the surface of the conductor?

FourierX
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the field of a point charge over a plane, if you follow a field line that starts at the point charge in a horizontal direction, that is, parallel to the plane, where does it meet the surface of the conductor?

Homework Equations


The problem 'hint' is "You'll need Gauss' law and a simple integration."

The Attempt at a Solution


The electric field on the surface of the conductor at a radius R=\sqrt{r^{2}+h^{2}} (h is the height of the pt charge, r is the x component of the radius on the plane), the Electric field due to the point charge is:
E=\frac{-2Qh}{(r^{2}+h^{2})^{3/2}}. This is given in the book.
I have no idea where to start...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you quoted the question exactly as it was given to you? It appears somewhat poorly written. Is this supposed to be understood in the context of a previous problem, for instance?

Specifically, is the point charge located near an infinite, grounded conducting plane?

Please write down the original question exactly as provided.
 
the plane is grounded and i figured out that the net electric field is directed towards negative Z direction. I have to find out the distance of a point in the plane (x-axis). I thought of using a concept of projectile motion as the trajectory looks parabolic, but I am not quite sure how to get to the final conclusion.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top