Where Does a Pendulum Reach Maximum Momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shindo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Momentum
AI Thread Summary
A pendulum reaches its maximum momentum directly beneath its point of attachment, where potential energy is zero and kinetic energy is at its peak. The discussion emphasizes that while maximum kinetic energy corresponds to maximum speed, momentum calculations require knowledge of mass, which cannot be omitted. The calculations presented illustrate the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy, but clarify that potential energy should be expressed in terms of mass. The conversation also highlights the importance of proper algebraic manipulation before substituting numerical values. Understanding the relationship between momentum and displacement is crucial for a complete mathematical proof.
Shindo
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pendulum hung by a string that is 90m (simplicity's sake) can come a maximum of 72m leftward or right ward. Where does it feel it's maximum momentum?

m=meters M=mass

Homework Equations


PE=mgh
KE=.5(M)(v)^2
Mv= momentum

The Attempt at a Solution


My question is: will a pendulum always have its maximum momentum right underneath its point of attachment (0 restoring force)? This is when Potential Energy is zero, so it should have it's maximum kinetic energy, meaning it's maximum speed and thus it's maximum momentum. Right?

So in finding the ball's maximum height, 90^2-72^2=54^2

Meaning it's 36 (90-54) meters above it's lowest point.

Mgh=M(9.8)(36)=353M

if we take the mass out of all equations (and still call it joules) then:

PE=353J

353J=.5(v)^2

v=26.6 m/s

Is this how you would find this kind of answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reasoning from conservation of energy is the usual approach, yeah.
You cannot take the mass out of the equations and still call it joules though - it has to be called "square speed" or "meters per second all squared".

$$mgh = \frac{p^2}{2m} \implies p=m\sqrt{2gh}$$ ... so you cannot do it without knowing the mass.
 
Simon Bridge said:
so you cannot do it without knowing the mass.

Right, but in this case since the mass doesn't change it doesn't change where the ball feels its maximum momentum.
 
Right, but in this case since the mass doesn't change it doesn't change where the ball feels its maximum momentum.
That's fine: the actual calculation you demonstrated from "attempt at a solution"? was finding the max speed of the pendulum. To find the max momentum you need the mass; in that calculation you wrote PE=353J ... which is false, actually PE=353(J/kg)M(kg); it is best practice to do the algebra before you put the numbers in.

The argument that max KE corresponds to max momentum is usually sufficient ... to prove it, mathematically, is different.
For that you want to find a relation between momentum and displacement, then find the maxima.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top