Where Does the Energy Go When a Ball Slides Down a Ramp?

AI Thread Summary
When a ball slides down a ramp and reaches the ground, its energy transformation raises questions about energy conservation and momentum. The discussion posits that as the ball moves, some energy is transferred to the ramp, causing it to move slightly in the opposite direction. If the ramp has infinite mass, it theoretically wouldn't move, but the energy transfer dynamics still apply, with the ball's energy being lost to the system. If the ramp is anchored, the force exerted by the ball would not result in movement unless it exceeds the static friction threshold. Ultimately, the energy lost by the ball can be accounted for by the energy gained by the ramp, depending on its mass and frictional properties.
daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
Lets say you have a ball on a ramp (hight h). It rolls down to the ground and then starts moving at aconstant speed - no friction (ok don't kill me, it's not really rolling either, just sliding). Now to the point of view of someone moving at the final speed of the ball and in the same direction, let's call it v, the ball starts with hoight h and with speed -v, and at the end it has hight 0 and speed 0. Were did all the energy go?
I think that since the ramp can't have infinate mass it must go a little backwards as the ball goes forwards (momentum conservation), in the first case the ramp starts with 0 speed and then gets a little from the ball, and in the second case the ramp starts with -v and then gets more from the ball so the difference is much bigger (for example,
11^2 - 10^2 > 2^2 - 1^2). This difference in energy is equal to the energy lost by the ball. (I calculated it and it worked)
Is this the right answer? What happens if the ramp has infinate mass(theoreticly)?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe a better question is what happens if you anchor the ramp. If the coefficient of friction between the ramp and the ground is 0 (which i think is what you're getting at), than the ramp would always move in a direction opposite the ball, less and less as the mass of the ramp increases compared to the ball. If the ramp was anchored (which I'm hoping you take as a substitute for infinite mass) the force that wants to push it backwards is still there, it just will be in the opposite direction -the ball- until that force is greater than the static coefficient of friction of the ramp (which we can consider way higher by anchoring it)
 
Back
Top