Where does this equation for an ellipse come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter davidbenari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the general equation for an ellipse presented in a professor's notes, which is questioned for its validity. The provided equation involves parameters related to the ellipse's orientation and semi-axes, specifically incorporating angles that determine the rotation of the ellipse. Participants suggest starting with a standard ellipse equation in a rotated coordinate system and applying trigonometric transformations to derive the equation in Cartesian coordinates. The conversation highlights the distinction between a parameterized equation, which includes time, and a path equation, which describes the set of points traced by a moving particle. Ultimately, the goal is to validate the professor's equation and understand its derivation.
davidbenari
Messages
466
Reaction score
18
I'm reading the professors notes and he gives this general equation for the ellipse. The professor has already been mistaken in some of his notes so I wanted you to help me validate what he's saying, as I can't prove the equation.

Suppose we have the vector ##\mathbf{r}=\big(x_o \cos(-\omega t + \phi_x), y_o \cos(-\omega t +\phi_y)\big)##

Then, he says that the general equation for the path is:

##\frac{x}{x_o}^2+\frac{y}{y_o}^2-\frac{2xy}{x_oy_o}\cos\delta=\sin^2\delta##

where ##\delta=\phi_y-\phi_x##.

So my question was where does this equation come from? How can I derive it? I know these type of equations are tedious to prove so it's okay if you give me a rough outline, or point me towards a source which does go through it. Or at least tell me you attest to its validity. I can't find the equation elsewhere and I haven't been able to prove it myself.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If ##\phi_x-\phi_y## is not an odd multiple of ##\frac{\pi}{2}## the ##xy## term will be nonzero, so the ellipse axes will be rotated relative to the x and y axes.

Start with an x-y coordinate system and then consider a second coordinate system X-Y whose origin is at (u,v) in the x,-y coordinates and whose X and Y axes are angle ##\theta## to the anticlockwise direction from the x and y axes.

Consider an ellipse centred at (u,v) with semi-major and semi-minor axes of a and b aligned with the X and Y axes. The equation of that ellipse is ##\frac{X^2}{a^2}+\frac{Y^2}{b^2}=1##.

With a bit of messy trigonometry you should be able to convert that into an equation in x-y coordinates. Then match terms to the given equation and work out what ##\phi_x,\phi_y,x_0,y_0## represent in the diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes davidbenari
Nice, i'll try it in a while. How would time dependence vanish though?
 
Oh I think I see it... The arguments would be subtracted, right?
 
The equation without time in it is an equation of a 'path', which differs from a 'curve' in that it is not parameterised. It simply specifies the set of points that are traced out by a particle following the curve. The equation with t in it is a parametrised equation, which shows how the path is traversed over time. A simple analog is the circle, whose parametric equation is ##x=r\cos t,\ y=\sin t## and the equation for the path traced out is ##x^2+y^2=1##.

I expect (but do not guarantee :wink:) that a parametric equation matching the given one will suggest itself once an equation for the path has been obtained.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top