Where is the intertial frame of reference applicable?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Newton's laws within an inertial frame of reference, emphasizing that it is the observer, not the object, who experiences no net forces. An observer in an inertial frame can accurately describe an object's motion and apply Newton's laws, regardless of the object's initial conditions. The principle of inertia allows for the understanding that an object in motion will continue at constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. The conversation also highlights the importance of recognizing different inertial frames, which can all validly apply Newton's laws. Understanding these concepts is crucial for a comprehensive grasp of classical mechanics.
readingforev
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
(Please forgive me for the obvious stupidity of this question)

I'm trying to understand Newton's laws down to the last detail, because that is how I study things. However, where would the principle of inertia ever take place? And since Newton's laws are only applicable in an inertia frame reference, are the laws correct? How would an object in motion going at its constant velocity without any "forces" get in motion in a frame of inertia without an initial force? Does it mean that it was in a place that started it's one initial push of force then it entered a place with no forces, where it would continue on forever?

Thank you for any answers in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

The inertial frame of reference refers to that of the observer, not to the object. It is the observer who has no forces acting on him. He can use his inertial frame of reference coordinate system to quantify the kinematics of the object's motion, and to apply Newton's laws. Another observer from another inertial frame of reference can do the same, and still have Newton's laws properly apply in his frame of reference. This is how the principle of inertia works.
 
Where would an observer have no forces acting upon him? How is it used to quantify the kinematics?

Thank you for your patience.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top