Finding the Equilibrium Position for Three Charges

AI Thread Summary
To find the equilibrium position for the third charge, the net electrostatic force on it must be zero, which occurs when the forces from the other two charges balance. The initial setup involves two positive charges, with the third charge needing to be positioned between them. The user attempted to set up the equation using Coulomb's law but encountered difficulties with cross-multiplication and solving for the distance. Clarification was provided that a quadratic equation should be formed after correctly cross-multiplying both sides. The discussion emphasizes the need to accurately manipulate the equation to find the correct position for the third charge.
Fireupchip
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge of 2.21E-9 C is placed at the origin, and a charge of 3.78E-9 C is placed at x = 1.60 m. Find the position at which a third charge of 2.94E-9 C can be placed so that the net electrostatic force on it is zero.

Homework Equations


Coloumb's law

The Attempt at a Solution



All 3 charges are positive, so for the net force to be zero, I believe that the 3rd charge will go in the middle of the other 2 charges.

+q1 |----1.60m - r -----| +q3 |------ r------| +q2

Knowns:
q1 = 2.21 x 10^-9 C
q2 = 3.78 x 10^-9 C
q3 = 2.94 x 10^-9 C
r (between q1 and q2) = 1.60 m

F1 = F2

the k and q3 both cancel, leaving me with:

q1 / (1.60m - r)^2 = q2 / r^2

I cross multiplied, giving me:

q1 / q2 = (1.60m - r)^2 / r^2

This is where I think I'm having a problem. From this point, I found 2 different answers, and both turned out to be wrong: 0.91m and 1.05m (both from q1). Can anyone please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't completely "cross multiply" (and I dislike that term). You did multiply on both sides by the denominator on the left, (160- r)^2. Now multiply on both sides by the denominator on the right to get (q1/q2)r^2= (160- r)^2. Multiply out the square on the right and you a quadratic equation to solve for r.
 
So if I multiply the square out on the right, there'll still be an r on the left side.
 
My physics professor said to avoid using the quadratic equation in this situation. Where am I going wrong?
 
Anyone?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top