Where on the X-Axis is the Net Electric Force Zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the position along the x-axis where the net electric force on a charge q3 is zero, given two other charges, q1 and q2. The equations derived show that the forces acting on q3 from q1 and q2 must balance, leading to a quadratic equation. The solution to this equation reveals that the distance x, where the net force is zero, is equal to d/3. The participants clarify the steps involved in solving the quadratic equation, emphasizing the application of standard formulas. Ultimately, the problem is resolved, confirming the position of charge q3.
Zackkkkkk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1.An electric charge q1 (-e) is located at the origin. A second electric charge q2 (-4e) is located at a distance d from the origin on the x-axis. A third charge q3 (+e) is located a distance x, which is less than d, on the x-axis between q1 and q2. In terms of d, what is the distance x where the net electric force is zero?

2. I just need a pretty thorough explanation. Not a broken stream of steps.F = F1 - F2
F = 0
then
F1 = F2
kq1q3 / x^2 = kq2q3 / (d-x)^2
q1 / x^2 = q2 / (d-x)^2
(d-x)^2 - (q2/q1)x^2 = 0
...

I've made it as far as this and then asked for help on another site. Someone responded with the following:

F = F1 - F2 [forces are opposite]
F = 0
then
F1 = F2
kq1q3 / x^2 = kq2q3 / (d-x)^2
q1 / x^2 = q2 / (d-x)^2
(d-x)^2 - (q2/q1)x^2 = 0
(1-q2/q1)x^2 -2dx + d^2 = 0
-3x^2 -2dx + d^2 = 0
x = [2d +- (4d^2 - 12d^2)^1/2] / (-6)
x = d/3

I have no clue what he/she did after line 9 (-3x^2 -2dx+d^2 = 0).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zackkkkkk said:
-3x^2 -2dx + d^2 = 0
x = [2d +- (4d^2 - 12d^2)^1/2] / (-6)
x = d/3

I have no clue what he/she did after line 9 (-3x^2 -2dx+d^2 = 0).
She just applied the standard formula for solving a quadratic.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
haruspex said:
She just applied the standard formula for solving a quadratic.
I figured it out. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top