Where to place a third charge so it experiences no force

AI Thread Summary
To find the position for a third charge that experiences no net force between two existing charges, the forces exerted by both charges must balance. The equation derived is q1/r^2 = -q2/(r - d)^2, where q1 is the positive charge and q2 is the negative charge. It is crucial to note that the third charge cannot be placed between the two existing charges due to opposing forces acting on it. A correction was made regarding the negative sign in the equation, emphasizing the need to account for the nature of the charges. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the principles of electrostatics to solve the problem.
alxkrgr
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge of 5.6 microcoulombs is placed at the origin (x=0) of a coordinate system, and another charge of -1.9 microcouloumbs is placed on the x-axis at .29m. Where on the axis can a third charge be placed so that it experiences no charge?

q1= 5.6 E-6
q2= -1.9 E-6
d= .29m

Homework Equations


F= k*(q1*q2)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Fnet = F1,3 + F2,3
Fnet = 0
F1,3 = -(F2,3)
k*(q1*q3)/r^2 =k*(q2*q3)/(r-distance)^2
i know the k and q3 variables cancel out so i get
q1/r^2 = q2/(r-distance)^2

after i get this far I can't seem to get a correct answer. any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't the distance from the second charge be (.29 - r) where r is the distance from the origin?
 
J Hann said:
Shouldn't the distance from the second charge be (.29 - r) where r is the distance from the origin?

Yes, I accidentally reversed it in my post. Thanks for pointing that out.
 
Also, remember that the third (test) charge cannot be between the first two charges because one charge will
attract the test charge and one charge will repel the test charge.
 
J Hann said:
Also, remember that the third (test) charge cannot be between the first two charges because one charge will
attract the test charge and one charge will repel the test charge.

so should the charge on q2 be q2/(.29 PLUS r)?
 
alxkrgr said:

Homework Statement


A point charge of 5.6 microcoulombs is placed at the origin (x=0) of a coordinate system, and another charge of -1.9 microcouloumbs is placed on the x-axis at .29m. Where on the axis can a third charge be placed so that it experiences no charge force?

q1= 5.6 E-6
q2= -1.9 E-6
d= .29m

Homework Equations


F= k*(q1*q2)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Fnet = F1,3 + F2,3
Fnet = 0
F1,3 = -(F2,3)
k*(q1*q3)/r^2 =k*(q2*q3)/(r-distance)^2
i know the k and q3 variables cancel out so i get
q1/r^2 = q2/(r-distance)^2

after i get this far I can't seem to get a correct answer. any help would be greatly appreciated!
You have typo which I have indicated above.

Your equation, q1/r2 = q2/(r - d)2 is missing a negative sign. (Remember, q2 is itself negative.)

That makes it q1/r2 = -q2/(r - d)2 .

Take the square root of both sides remembering to use a ± on one side or the other. Solve for r .

alxkrgr said:
so should the charge on q2 be q2/(.29 PLUS r)?
That does not make sense. Did you mean "Should q3 be q2/(.29 + r) " ?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top