Which book to read after quantum mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

After completing J.J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics," the discussion centers on choosing between two advanced texts: a path integration book suitable for advanced undergraduates or graduate students and "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" by Anthony Zee. Participants recommend comparing the tables of contents to determine which book aligns with the reader's learning goals and prerequisite knowledge. They suggest sampling the first chapters of both books to gauge personal preference and emphasize the importance of writing style and usability for learning versus reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles as covered in J.J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics."
  • Familiarity with advanced undergraduate or graduate-level physics concepts.
  • Knowledge of path integral formulation in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic concepts of quantum field theory (QFT).
NEXT STEPS
  • Compare the tables of contents of the path integration book and "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell."
  • Read the first two chapters of both books to assess writing style and content clarity.
  • Research the path integral formulation in quantum mechanics for deeper understanding.
  • Explore reviews and summaries of Ryder's QFT book for additional insights.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particularly those at the advanced undergraduate or graduate level, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory.

captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
i just finished reading j.j. sakurai's qm book and was have two books. one that is about path integration that starts out on a level for advanced undergrads or graduate students and one that is qft in a nutshell by zee. i can't decide which to start first. I am leaning toward the path integration book, but i am still not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know either of them, but it depends on what you want to learn and what your current level is.
You should start by comparing the tables of contents and decide which one gives the information you want to get first, and see if maybe for one you need prerequisite knowledge that the other one covers. If they are (almost) equivalent, you could start by reading a bit, like the first two chapters, in each of them and see which you like best.
Also, sometimes books are very well for looking stuff up, but not so well if you want to learn something from them; sometimes it's the other way around. And then there is the writing style you like best.
I don't think other people can really give you a definitive advise on which one to read first, just browse through them and pick one. Or you could compare the subjects and read about the same subject in both, so you have comparison.

But maybe you can give the title of the other one as well?

By the way, I have a book by Ryder on QFT. Haven't really looked into it much yet, and most of it is outside the range of the course I'm taking at the moment, but by the looks of it it's a solid and well-written book.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K