Which came first, the ##\exists## or the ##\forall##?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origins and design of the mathematical quantifiers "for all" (∀) and "there exists" (∃). It speculates on how these symbols may have been creatively derived from the letters "A" and "E" through flipping or rotating them. The conversation references historical figures like Charles Sanders Peirce, William Ernest Johnson, and Giuseppe Peano, highlighting their contributions to quantification notation. Peano's notation became widely adopted in mathematical logic, influencing works like the Principia Mathematica. The introduction of the ∀ symbol by Gentzen in 1935 and its eventual canonization in the 1960s is also noted. Additionally, the practicality of creating new symbols through metal type manipulation before computer typesetting is mentioned, emphasizing the evolution of mathematical notation.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41
I've always imagined that some mathematician or logician was looking for a cool way to write these quantifiers, and one of the following scenarios happened:

1.)

"Hey, I know, for "For All," I'll just take the letter "A" and flip it vertically, giving me this lovely ##\forall##. Then I'll just do the same thing with the letter "E" for "There Exists."

But wait, the letter "E" is vertically symmetric, it'll look the same!" *flips it horizontally instead.


2.)

"Hey, I know, for "There Exists," I'll just take the letter "E" and flip it horizontally, giving me this lovely ##\exists##. Then I'll just do the same thing with the letter "A" for "For All."

But wait, the letter "A" is horizontally symmetric, it'll look the same!" *flips it vertically instead.



So the question is, what came first, the ##\forall## or the ##\exists##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From wiki:

Peirce's approach to quantification also influenced William Ernest Johnson and Giuseppe Peano, who invented yet another notation, namely (x) for the universal quantification of x and (in 1897) ∃x for the existential quantification of x. Hence for decades, the canonical notation in philosophy and mathematical logic was (x)P to express "all individuals in the domain of discourse have the property P," and "(∃x)P" for "there exists at least one individual in the domain of discourse having the property P." Peano, who was much better known than Peirce, in effect diffused the latter's thinking throughout Europe. Peano's notation was adopted by the Principia Mathematica of Whitehead and Russell, Quine, and Alonzo Church. In 1935, Gentzen introduced the ∀ symbol, by analogy with Peano's ∃ symbol. ∀ did not become canonical until the 1960s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantification
 
Another mystery dispelled by wikipedia.
 
1MileCrash said:
But wait, the letter "E" is vertically symmetric, it'll look the same!" *flips it horizontally instead.

But wait, the letter "A" is horizontally symmetric, it'll look the same!" *flips it vertically instead.
True but probably irrelevant. Both symbols are rotated through 180 degrees.

Before computer typesetting, using metal type "upside down" was an easy way to get new symbols.
 
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was headed to Europe to study art and painting, but stopped in New York and studied acting. Notable movies include Barefoot in the Park (1967 with Jane Fonda), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969, with Paul Newma), Jeremiah Johnson, the political drama The Candidate (both 1972), The Sting (1973 with Paul Newman), the romantic dramas The Way We Were (1973), and...
Back
Top