Which Eigenvector is Wrong for Finding Eigenvalues of a Matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter :Buddy:
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors
:Buddy:
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Too many Eigenvectors!?

Homework Statement


I have to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of:

-1 2 -2
1 2 1
-1 -1 0

and I can find four eigenvectors I'm not sure how to tell which of my eigenvectors is
wrong as they all seem to satisfy Av=λv
(i also checked that they arent simply multiples of each other)

The Attempt at a Solution


i used
det(A-λI)=0
to get λ=-1,1,1

then i used the definition Av=λv

to get the eigenvectors
[0,1,-1], [1,-1,0], [1,0,-1], [1,-2,1]

im not sure which of these is wrong and why
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The eigenvalues of the matrix you showed are not -1,1,1. How did you conclude that? Is there a typo?
 


yes it was a typo sorry
the matrix was meant to be

-1 -2 -2
1 2 1
-1 -1 0
 


:Buddy: said:
yes it was a typo sorry
the matrix was meant to be

-1 -2 -2
1 2 1
-1 -1 0

Writing v1=[1,-1,0] and v2=[0,1,-1], v1 and v2 are both independent eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalue 1. And you are allowed to have two of those since the eigenvalue 1 has multiplicity 2. The other two vectors you wrote are v1+v2 and v1-v2. There are lots more eigenvectors corresponding the eigenvalue 1 as well, any linear combination of v1 and v2 will do. What you are missing is the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue -1.
 
Last edited:


thanks! I hadn't realized that linear combinations would be solutions. I now have a correct ( I think) set of vectors

v1=[-1 1 0]
v2=[-1 0 1]
v3=[2 -1 1]

:)
 


One of the very first things you should have learned about eigenvectors is there is NOT a single unique eigenvector corresponding to a given eigenvalue. In fact, the set of all eigenvectors corresponding to a given eigenvalue form a subspace which necessarily contains linear combinations.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top