Chemistry Which Group Exhibits a Stronger Inductive Effect, Sec-Butyl or Propyl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics lover
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the inductive effect of sec-butyl versus propyl groups. There is confusion regarding whether the number of carbon atoms or their distance from the electronegative atoms is more significant in determining the +I effect. It is suggested that sec-butyl may have a weaker inductive effect due to the terminal carbon's electronegativity being influenced by the additional methyl group. However, clarity in expression and understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the inductive effect are emphasized as crucial for academic success. Ultimately, a precise and systematic approach to the question is necessary for a convincing argument.
Physics lover
Messages
249
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
Which has more +I effect Propyl or Sec butyl
Relevant Equations
Inductive effect
Difference in electronegativity
Distance dependent
I am confused.If i think in terms of distance than propyl group in sec butyl is far away than in normal propyl.But if think in no. of Carbon atoms then sec butyl should have more +I effect as it is has more Carbon atoms.
Tell me which is the correct one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics lover said:
Homework Statement: Which has more +I effect Propyl or Sec butyl
Homework Equations: Inductive effect
Difference in electronegativity
Distance dependent

I am confused.If i think in terms of distance than propyl group in sec butyl is far away than in normal propyl.But if think in no. of Carbon atoms then sec butyl should have more +I effect as it is has more Carbon atoms.
Tell me which is the correct one?
Your second sentence practically does not mean anything that I can understand. Distance of what from what?

Don't think so much about rules as mechanisms – what is the mechanism of the inductive effect? Then look at the structures and see what that seems to imply.
 
i
epenguin said:
Your second sentence practically does not mean anything that I can understand. Distance of what from what?

Don't think so much about rules as mechanisms – what is the mechanism of the inductive effect? Then look at the structures and see what that seems to imply.
think sec butyl has more inductive effect as there is 1 more ch3 group in it than n propyl.So am i Correct?
 
Physics lover said:
i

think sec butyl has more inductive effect as there is 1 more ch3 group in it than n propyl.So am i Correct?

Maybe, but not precise enough to convince a sceptical examiner completely. 2-methylpropan-1-ol ("isobutanol") also has one more -CH3 group than propan-1-ol ( using the proper names is also more helpful and convincing) - does that have a greater inductive effect?
You need to briefly invoke and specify the physical mechanism of the inductive effect, not just rules and names.
 
epenguin said:
Maybe, but not precise enough to convince a sceptical examiner completely. 2-methylpropan-1-ol ("isobutanol") also has one more -CH3 group than propan-1-ol ( using the proper names is also more helpful and convincing) - does that have a greater inductive effect?
You need to briefly invoke and specify the physical mechanism of the inductive effect, not just rules and names.
ok as we know inductive effect occurs due to difference in electronegativity of atoms.In this case the terminal carbon atom in sec butyl would be more electronegative than that in n propyl as it will have more partial negative charge on terminal carbon due to presence of 1 more ch3 group than n propyl.Therefore sec butyl should be weaker +i group than n propyl.Am i correct now?
 
I don't think so, but even if you are it is not doing you much good because of the lack of clarity with which you express it.
I.e. wouldn't do you much good for grades or examinations. As one Prof said to me, is the student is on top of the question it hits you in the face as soon as you see his answer.

With other answers he might be saying to himself yes, no, maybe.If you are lucky enough that you can have some interaction with him he might try to ascertain or to hint or remind you or set you thinking by asking a further question.If then you don't reply to that what is he going to conclude? He'll put that down as a No.

In your answer it will also help clarity if you can use the systematic terminology that I am using in #5.You may not have learned this yet, but the examples are sufficient for all you need to this problem.Then each atom has a number and you can state which atom you are referring to C1, C4 or what.
 
Last edited:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top