Courses Which is more challenging -- Graduate vs Undergraduate Physics Courses

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparative challenges of undergraduate versus graduate physics courses. Many participants agree that graduate courses tend to be more conceptually and technically difficult due to the specialized nature of the material. While undergraduate students often have access to a variety of resources to help understand difficult concepts, such as textbooks and online platforms, these resources become limited in graduate studies. However, some participants note that their performance improves in graduate school due to increased maturity, experience, and a better understanding of study techniques. The consensus suggests that while graduate courses are more challenging, students often find them easier to navigate due to their enhanced skills and confidence in applying concepts learned during their undergraduate studies.
Josh0768
Messages
53
Reaction score
6
When first encountering them, did you find your undergraduate physics courses or your graduate physics courses to be more conceptually and technically challenging?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found my grad physics courses to be way more challenging, for one major reason. As an undergrad, if you struggle with a particular concept, there are plenty of other resources. If you struggle in Griffiths quantum, maybe you can find a different explanation (that might "click" more) in Sakurai, or by looking at Khan Academy, posting for homework help on this forum, etc. Once your education gets more "specialized", those resources become few and far between.
 
  • Like
Likes Josh0768 and Choppy
I think the content of the graduate courses was more difficult, but I was a better student in grad school than I had been as an undergrad. I was older, more mature/serious about studying; plus I had four years of undergrad experience in "learning how to study," if that makes sense.
 
  • Like
Likes vela
Undergrad courses were harder for me, because I was still struggling with the math.
 
  • Like
Likes clope023
Dr. Courtney said:
Undergrad courses were harder for me, because I was still struggling with the math.

Same, senior ugrad and grad courses have so far been easier because I'm not struggling with learning concepts I'm just instead learning on how to apply them.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Back
Top