What minimum speed v is required to keep the ball moving in a circle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the minimum speed required to keep a ball moving in a circular path, with specific attention to a related problem involving projectile motion. The angle of 66.1 degrees is initially mentioned but later clarified as irrelevant to the main problem. Participants emphasize the importance of using conservation of energy to determine the vertical component of velocity, noting that horizontal motion does not affect gravitational potential energy. The work done by gravity is calculated using the formula mg(A-B), where A and B represent the heights involved in the motion. The conversation concludes with a clarification on the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in the context of projectile motion.
pringless
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
got it hehe..
can someone check a post down and help me with that problem. thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand the question.
and use the angle theta measured with respect to the vertical which is 66.1 degrees.
What does this mean? Where did 66.1 degrees come from? What significance does it have? How am I supposed to "use" it?"
What minimum speed v is required to keep the ball moving in a circle?
But the problem already gives the velocity at the top of the circle -- so you can solve easily for the velocity at any other part of the circle. What minimum velocity is it asking about?

- Warren
 
mm sorry, the angle was for another part of the problem. i got it by using the formula mv^2/r = mg and solving for v.

but this problem:
A particle of mass .349kg is shot from a point P, at height L = 97 m, with an inital velocity v having a horizontal component of v_x = 19.5 m/s. The particle rises to a maximum height of h = 22.5 m above P. Using conservation of energy, determine the vertical component of v at the inital position P.

im not sure how to get components with energy
 
Originally posted by pringless

A particle of mass .349kg is shot from a point P, at height L = 97 m, with an inital velocity v having a horizontal component of v_x = 19.5 m/s. The particle rises to a maximum height of h = 22.5 m above P. Using conservation of energy, determine the vertical component of v at the inital position P.
The horizontal and vertical motions are independent. For this problem, just completely ignore the horizontal component. The 19.5 m/s is just a red herring!

Gravity only "works" vertically -- in other words, the horizontal position of the particle doesn't have anything to do with the particle's gravitational potential energy. The only thing that matters for gravity is its vertical position.

The particle moved 22.5 m upwards, trading all of its initial vertical kinetic energy for gravitational potential energy. The original vertical kinetic energy was K = (1/2) m v_{iy}^2. The final gravitational potential energy of the particle is m g y. Since the particle traded all of its vertical kinetic energy for gravitational potential, the two energies are equal:

\frac{1}{2} m v_{iy}^2 = m g y

v = \sqrt{2 g y}

Does this make sense? Note that this is exactly the velocity that the particle would have if it FELL 22.5 meters! It's the same problem, just going up instead of down. As you probably know, if you throw a ball upwards with some velocity v, it comes down again with the same velocity v.

- Warren
 
thanks warren... i was trying to use the horizontal component they gave me to solve the problem. oops.

now i have to find thework done by the gravitational force on the particle during its motion to a point B, which is at the end of the parabolic motion located L + h distance down.

to find the work done by the graviational force on the particle would i just be using mgh but with the total distance of L + h now?
 
Originally posted by pringless
to find the work done by the graviational force on the particle would i just be using mgh but with the total distance of L + h now?
If you're referring to the work done from the highest point in its motion, yes.

The work done on the particle by gravity in moving from height A to height B is mg(A-B).

- Warren
 
how would i find the magnitude of the vertical component of the velocity vector when the particle hits point B
 
The gravitational potential energy lost = the vertical kinetic energy gained. Exactly as in the last problem.

- Warren
 
so PE_initial = KE_final

mgh = .5mv^2

v = sqrroot(2gh), h = L = 97 right?
 
  • #10
Yes, but I'm not sure where you got h = L = 97 m. I thought the problem said h = 22.5 m.

- Warren
 
  • #11
its one of those problems where the projectile motion parabola is extended past the ground, so its all the way down which is what L = 97 in the problem is refereing to
 
Back
Top