Which of the symptoms is characteristic for food allergy

AI Thread Summary
Characteristic symptoms of food allergies include bumps on the face and difficulty breathing, while flu symptoms are not relevant. The discussion highlights the variability in allergic reactions, emphasizing that symptoms can differ among individuals. It is advised to seek professional medical advice for accurate diagnosis rather than self-diagnosing. The conversation also touches on the importance of understanding the specific type of rash associated with allergic reactions. Overall, clarity on symptoms is crucial for identifying food allergies effectively.
zade70
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the symptoms is characteristic for food allergy
bumps (pimple) on the face
difficulty in breathing
flue
none of these

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm between the first and second.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If this is a theoretical question, I will leave it for the medically trained as personal experiences show that not everyone presents the same symptoms with allergic reactions to some things, and especially consumables.

If you actually are experiencing symptoms and are trying to self diagnose, I recommend you seek proper medical advice instead. In general, the people here are helpful and like to present positive and correct answers, but some situations demand seeking a professional opinion. Personal health and survival is one of those.
 
zade70 said:

Homework Statement


Which of the symptoms is characteristic for food allergy
bumps (pimple) on the face
difficulty in breathing
flue
none of these

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm between the first and second.
You are correct to reject the 3rd choice "flu".

I think the difficulty in choosing between #1 and #2 may be an issue of semantics or language translation. Both difficulty breathing and a rash can be signs of an allergic reaction. But what kind of rash? How does it develop, and what does it look like? :smile:

Wee-Lamm said:
If you actually are experiencing symptoms and are trying to self diagnose, I recommend you seek proper medical advice instead.
I'm pretty sure it is just a schoolwork question. :smile:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top