Which one is more work-hardened than the other?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StudentForming
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the work-hardening effects of two cold drawing processes, comparing a single-stage reduction from φ7 to φ6.5 with a two-stage reduction from φ7 to φ6.8 and then to φ6.5. Participants suggest that the two-stage process may result in greater work hardening due to a more complex stress-strain path. They note that understanding the exact strain path during cold drawing is crucial for determining the extent of work hardening. The conversation highlights the challenges of proving this hypothesis without detailed analysis of the strain paths involved. Overall, the complexity of the cold drawing process complicates the assessment of work hardening between the two methods.
StudentForming
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
The effect on number of cold drawing to work-hardening.
Hi.

I wonder which one is more work-hardened in cold drawing process.

① φ7 -> φ6.5
② φ7 -> φ6.8 -> φ6.5

Final diameter is same, but the number of cold drawing is different.
In my guess, ② is more work-hardened even thought I can't explain the reason exactly.

If you know the answer and the mechanism, I hope you tell me about that.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
When a strain hardening material is loaded beyond yield, the stress reduced to zero, then again loaded beyond yield, the result is as shown below. The first loading takes it to Point A, then unloading takes to Point B. The material has yielded. On further loading, the material follows the dashed line back to Point A, after which it yields some more.
Plastic Strain.jpg

That is for simple tensile loading. A cold drawing process involves a more complex stress-strain path that complicates matters. Answering your question requires finding the exact strain path as the part goes through the cold drawing process. The image below shows a part that was cold drawn in two halves. Each half had lines scribed before drawing. After drawing, the two halves were separated. The lines are no longer straight. I believe this means that the actual strain path is more complex than that of a simple tensile test, which would imply (but does not prove) that drawing in two stages might cause more work hardening than drawing in one stage.
Cold Draw.jpg


I cannot explain it exactly either, but I think you are right. Proving it would require studying the strain path through the cold drawing process.
 
Back
Top