Which Statement About Magnetic Fields and Moving Charges is Correct?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic fields can change the direction of a moving charge, as demonstrated by devices like mass spectrometers. The assertion that magnetic fields can do work on a moving charge is incorrect, as work done is zero due to the angle of force and motion. Consequently, magnetic fields cannot accelerate a moving charge, particularly in cases of circular motion where speed remains constant. The force on a moving charge in a magnetic field cannot align with the magnetic field direction, making that statement false. Overall, the discussion clarifies that magnetic fields influence direction but do not perform work or change kinetic energy.
Sgtsloth
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
What statement about magnetic fields interacting with a moving charge is correct?
A) Magnetic fields can’t change the direction of motion of a moving charge.
B) Magnetic fields can do work on a moving charge.
C) Magnetic fields can accelerate a moving charge.
D) The force on a moving charge in a magnetic field can be in the direction of the magnetic field.
E) Magnetic fields can increase or decrease the kinetic energy of a moving charge.



I know B) isn't correct, since the angle leads to any work being zero., although others I have read online says that it can do work so I don't know what to think.

C) I don't think this can be true, since if you can't do work how can you cause acceleration?

D) is false for sure based on the right hand rule

E) Can KE change without work
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (C) consider the case of circular motion. Is work being done? Is there acceleration involved?
 
gneill said:
For (C) consider the case of circular motion. Is work being done? Is there acceleration involved?

I known that a varying magnetic field causes a an electric field that can do work, is that what you mean?
 
Sgtsloth said:
I known that a varying magnetic field causes a an electric field that can do work, is that what you mean?
No. I'm saying that you should consider the example of circular motion: an object moving in a circle at a constant speed. Is there acceleration involved?
 
gneill said:
No. I'm saying that you should consider the example of circular motion: an object moving in a circle at a constant speed. Is there acceleration involved?

Constant speed means there is no acceleration, thus C) is false. Am I correct that B is also wrong?
 
gneill said:
No. I'm saying that you should consider the example of circular motion: an object moving in a circle at a constant speed. Is there acceleration involved?
So you have to reply? PLEASE HELP, I have a test in an hour and to me all these answers seem false.
 
Sgtsloth said:
Constant speed means there is no acceleration, thus C) is false.
No, that's incorrect. Is acceleration defined as a rate of change in speed or a rate of change change in velocity? Is velocity constant for circular motion?
Am I correct that B is also wrong?
Yes.
 
Sgtsloth said:
So you have to reply? PLEASE HELP, I have a test in an hour and to me all these answers seem false.
Sorry, but to be frank, my schedule is split between volunteer work here and other unrelated matters. All helpers are volunteers. We do what we can.
 
gneill said:
No, that's incorrect. Is acceleration defined as a rate of change in speed or a rate of change change in velocity? Is velocity constant for circular motion?

Yes.

Thank you

Okay so Velocity changes direction in circular motion.

Let me go through my thinking.

(A) Mag fields CAN change direction, look at the mass spectrometer for example.
(B) We established is incorrect
C) The one in question.
D) Should be false based on the the right hand rule,
E) If no work can be done by a mag field (B), then it shouldn't be able to change a charge's KE.

Am I missing anything?
 
  • #10
Looks like you've covered it.
 
Back
Top