Which Wave Function Better Estimates the Ground-State Energy for V(x) = Kx^4?

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] QM variational principle

Homework Statement


In order to use the variational principle to estimate the ground-state energy of the one-dimensional potential V(x) = Kx^4, where K is a constant, which of the following wave functions would be a better trial wave function:

1) \psi(x) = e^{-\alpha x^2}

2) \psi(x) = x e^{-\alpha x^2}

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


The potential is symmetric, so we know that the wavefunctions have to be even or odd. The main difference is that the second has psi(0)=0 and is odd while the first one has psi(0)=1 and is even. So I am not sure why one of these is better than the other.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally, the more nodes in a wave function (points where psi=0), the higher the energy. So the first test function would be good to approximate the ground state, the second better for a first excited state. Remind yourself what the wavefunctions look like for the harmonic oscillator.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top