Who Will Win In a Downhill Race?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicStudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Race
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining which object will win a downhill race among various shapes, including a modified wooden disk, a metal sphere, and a cart with wheels. The modified disk is initially thought to have a lower coefficient of inertia, suggesting it would win, but the inclusion of the cart complicates the analysis. The cart's wheels rotate while the cart's body does not, requiring a different approach to derive its final velocity using conservation of energy principles. Participants are encouraged to consider how the number of wheels and the distribution of mass affect the cart's acceleration compared to the modified disk. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamics of both translational and rotational motion in solving the problem.
physicStudent
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Out of these various shapes: a wooden disk, a modified wooden disk with four pieces of metal in the middle, a smaller metal disk, a metal hoop, a small metal sphere, and a cart with four small wheels, who will win in a race rolling down a ramp with height h and angle Θ? An image of the cart is attached.

Homework Equations



v = \sqrt{\frac{2gh}{1+c}}, where c = coefficient of inertia

The Attempt at a Solution



We did an experiment in class where we were given the various shapes listed above (excluding the cart), and using the equation above, I found that the modified disk would win the race by thinking that the coefficient of its inertia must be smaller than that of the sphere (which came in second place with a coefficient of inertia of 2/5). However, I am stuck on this problem now with the inclusion of the cart. Any help is appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Dynamic_cart.jpg
    Dynamic_cart.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
When an object goes downhill it exchanges gravitatonal potential energy for other forms - including translational kinetic energy.

If the object rotates, then some of the energy gets stored in the rotation.

For most of your objects, the whole thing is rotating ... so the equation you have should work well.
For the cart, only the wheels are turning ... so you need to derive a different equation.
It has been included to see if you understand what you are doing instead of just plugging numbers into a potted solution.
 
So what would change in the conservation of energy equation to help in deriving this new equation? I assume that I would still be looking for the final velocity of the cart as it reaches the bottom of the ramp, but I'm not sure as to how to include the non-rotating portion of the cart into the equation. Also, would the number of wheels change the equation in any way?
 
Last edited:
You know that gravitational potential energy is traded for linear kinetic energy and rotational energy - start by writing out an expression that says that for the cart.
Which parts of the cart rotate? Which translate?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top