Whole wheat flour vs. regular white flour

  • Thread starter Thread starter aquitaine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regular
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nutritional differences between whole wheat and regular white bread, highlighting the confusion caused by New Age pseudoscience in nutrition. Whole wheat flour retains the bran, germ, and endosperm, making it higher in fiber and nutrients compared to refined white flour, which loses some of these components during processing. However, regular whole wheat bread often contains added sugars to mask its bitter taste and coarse texture, raising concerns about its health benefits. White whole wheat flour, made from white wheat, offers a milder flavor and softer texture, making it more appealing to some consumers. The conversation also touches on the potential health claims associated with whole grains, such as reduced colon cancer risk and improved digestion, questioning the validity of these assertions. Participants share links to scientific articles and databases for further exploration of nutritional content, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based information in dietary choices. Additionally, the discussion mentions the impact of fiber on blood sugar levels and the reasons for refining wheat, including shelf life considerations.
aquitaine
Messages
30
Reaction score
9
In the area of nutrition there's a huge amount of New Age pseudoscience so it's hard to know what's real from what's junk. Regarding this one particular issue I have to ask, is there any real scientific evidence to support the claim that whole wheat is better for your health than regular white?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Yes, "whole wheat flour contains the bran, germ and endosperm, it's higher in fiber and some nutrients, BUT

Regular white bread is made with refined grains, which go through a process that strips out certain parts of the grain — along with some of the nutrients and fiber. Although refined grains are enriched — they have some of the nutrients added back — they may not have exactly the same composition as whole grains.

The problem with regular whole wheat which is made from red wheat is
It has a slightly bitter taste and a coarser texture. So even though both types of bread are made with whole grains, they have a different color, taste and texture.
The problem with this is that you see bread made of traditional red whole wheat heavily sweetened, usually the second, third and even fourth ingredient can be corn syrup, honey, molasses, etc...which is not good.

Now there is white whole wheat flour
White whole-wheat bread is made from white wheat, which lacks bran color. It also has a milder flavor and softer texture.

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/expert-answers/whole-wheat-bread/faq-20057999
 
I was referring to just the flour to make bread, biscuits or whatever. But from what I've gathered from your post not only is there no fundamental difference between them but processed whole wheat in the form of already made bread is actually worse than regular white bread. Interesting.
 
aquitaine said:
I was referring to just the flour to make bread, biscuits or whatever. But from what I've gathered from your post not only is there no fundamental difference between them but processed whole wheat in the form of already made bread is actually worse than regular white bread. Interesting.
Well, like the article said, there is a difference, the parts that are removed from whole wheat can be mostly replaced through supplements, but not all. But now there is white whole wheat which sounds a bit more palatable for people that want a naturally sweeter, softer flour. it is not to be mistaken for refined white flour.
 
Evo said:
Well, like the article said, there is a difference, the parts that are removed from whole wheat can be mostly replaced through supplements, but not all. But now there is white whole wheat which sounds a bit more palatable for people that want a naturally sweeter, softer flour. it is not to be mistaken for refined white flour.
Right, but realistically can the nutrients lacking in white flour be taken in by eating other foods like salads? I've also seen so many claims about whole wheat, like it helps cut the risk for colon cancer, it's better for your digestive system, and so forth that seem a bit far fetched. The article didn't really go into those, but is there any real evidence to support any of it or is it all nonsense?
 
Thanks, it's very informative.
 
This site is the source in the US for most of the nutrition labeling data on foods. It is just the summary data from lots of extensive repeated chemical analysis of basic food items, with some processed foods also included. IF you have enough background in chem/biochem you can follow the references. Or even download the whole database - it is public domain.

It also used by School dieticians for menu formulation.

So, you can see for yourself. That is always best. I would highly recommend using this site for any questions about what nutrients are in almost any "normal"food items, plus what you might consider oddballs - they test things like raw polar bear meat:

http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods
 
  • Like
Likes Evo
But beyond just nutrition, isn't there also a difference in hypoglycemic loading? I thought that foods that have less soluble fibers tend to be absorbed faster into the blood stream, causing a spike in blood sugar.

Zz.
 
  • #10
The original reason for removing some of the wheat components from flour is that they spoil sooner than the starch, so bags of "refined" white flour have a much longer shelf life than wholemeal flour.

To recover some of the refinng losses, I'm never sure whether we should purchase raw wheat germ or "stabilsed" wheat germ; the latter, I think, having been heat treated (i.e., baked brown).
 
Back
Top