Why 0 and e^(-1x) Can't be Choices for the Basis of y``+y=secx

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Choices
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
for the problem:
y``+y=secx

why can't 0 and e^(-1x) be choices for the basis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be precise! What you mean is "why can't 0 and e-x be a basis for the solution space of the corresponding homogeneous equation".

I am sorely tempted to ask why in the world you think it should be. For one thing, the "0" vector (here, the function that is identically 0) is never a member of a basis- any set of vectors including 0 cannot be independent. But then I also wonder where you got "e-x[/sup}"!
What is the characteristic equation for y"= y= 0? What are its solutions?
 
i figured that if you wanted to solve the homogenous equation, then suppose that y=e^(namda)x
and subsitute that into the equation to find namda which equals 0 and
(-1)...
so i thought that since those two are the solutions to the homogeneous question, then couldn't they be the basis?
 
When did e^{namdax} (lambda?) become zero when namda is zero?

And the qustion still remains: a basis of what?

You haven't solved y''+y=0 correctly anyway. e^0 is constant, and y=const is not a solution of that equation, nor for that matter is e^{-x}
 
Last edited:
asdf1 said:
i figured that if you wanted to solve the homogenous equation, then suppose that y=e^(namda)x
and subsitute that into the equation to find namda which equals 0 and
(-1)...
so i thought that since those two are the solutions to the homogeneous question, then couldn't they be the basis?

First, it's "lambda", not "nambda":smile:. Yes, you "suppose that y= e^{\lambda x} and substitute that into the equation to find lamba which equals..." No, it does not equal 0 and -1! I asked before, what is the characteristic equation? What equation do you get when you substitute y= e^{\lambda x}?
 
sorry about the spelling! thanks for correcting that!
the characteristic equation is (lambda)^2+(lambda)=0
=> [(lamda)((lamda)+1)]=0
=>lamda=0, -1 ?
 
no it isn't, not unless you made a typo in the original post. you're characteristic equation is for y'' + y', when you wrote y'' + y
 
asdf1 said:
sorry about the spelling! thanks for correcting that!
the characteristic equation is (lambda)^2+(lambda)=0
=> [(lamda)((lamda)+1)]=0
=>lamda=0, -1 ?
The differential equation was y"+ y= 0. If y= e^{\lambda x} then y'= \lambdae^{\lambda x} and y"= \lambda^2e^{\lambda x}. The characteristic equation is [/itex]\lambda^2+ 1= 0[/itex] which has roots i and -i. A basis for the solution space is {sin x, cos x}.
If the original equation was y"+ y'= 0, then the characteristic equation is y"+ y= 0 which has roots 0 and -1. In that case a basis for the solution space would {e0x= 1, e-x}
 
opps... thank you for correcting me!
 
Back
Top