Why are computer programs unnecessarily complicated?

[leroyjenkens]

I was using iTunes, but I found myself having to do a Google search any time I wanted to do anything with it. And apparently lots of other people do too, because there's lots of results for the same exact questions I asked.
So I decided to find an alternative to iTunes. I found a program called MediaMonkey. Well, a simple thing like erasing the iPod or putting music on the iPod is so esoteric that I have to, yet again, do Google searches to find out how to do it. Why can't they just have a button that says "Erase iPod" or "drag music here to put on iPod"? I've had problems like this with other programs as well. The features are just worded strangely, or the path you have to take to get to your goal is obscure. "Would it be in tools, properties, or options?" And the features that are of the least importance are the first ones you see. You'd think the most important features of iPod programs would to put music on or take music off of the iPod. But to do that, you have to do Google searches.
However, if you want to "analyze volume" or access your "media server", it's right there in the front. No searching needed.

 

[Borg]

Why can't they just have a button that says "Erase iPod"...

Because if you put it right on top, people will do it accidently and then be upset that it was so easy to wreck their account.

 

[leroyjenkens]

Because if you put it right on top, people will do it accidently and then be upset that it was so easy to wreck their account.

I was exaggerating a little with that one. I once had a game for Playstation that had an option to "format" memory card. I was a kid at the time and didn't know what "format" meant. So I clicked the button and it erased my memory card. Why that game even had that option, I'll never know.

The point is, people download these programs to add and remove music from their iPod. The interface of the program could reflect what 99% of the users need to do most, but it doesn't.

 

[Borg]

I think that the problems with intuitiveness come from various situations. While the developers can have a big say in how the programs function, management does have the final word. I can think of a couple of plausible scenarios where functions won't be as intuitive as they could be.

1. Making the removal button not too easy but easier to access - management could decide that once the person removes the software, they are unlikely to return and therefore want to make that as difficult as possible.

2. The other one depends on the software process itself. I have seen a number of projects where the developers will be given the initial task of putting together rough storyboards or design ideas for their manager and the first set of rough sketches becomes the design whether it makes sense or not. And, it's hard sometimes for developers to step back and look at their layout from a user's point of view. For the developer, even a convoluted process can seem 'obvious' to them because they've worked with it continuously.

 

[LudusRex]

I understand the frustration with complex computer programs. The root cause of this issue is often the desire to include a wide range of features and capabilities in a single program, which can lead to a cluttered and confusing interface. Additionally, the developers may not have considered the user experience and may have prioritized certain features over others based on their own preferences.

In order to create a more user-friendly program, developers should prioritize simplicity and ease of use. This can be achieved through user testing and feedback, as well as streamlining the interface and making commonly used features more easily accessible. It is also important for developers to consider the needs and abilities of their target audience, as well as incorporating clear and concise labeling and instructions.

In the case of the iTunes alternative, MediaMonkey, it is possible that the developers were trying to cater to a wide range of users with varying levels of technical knowledge. However, this can often backfire and lead to a confusing and frustrating experience for all users. It is important for developers to strike a balance between including necessary features and keeping the program user-friendly and intuitive.

In conclusion, the complexity of computer programs often stems from a combination of factors such as the desire to include numerous features, lack of consideration for user experience, and catering to a wide range of users. By prioritizing simplicity and user feedback, developers can create more user-friendly programs that meet the needs of their target audience.