Why Are the EOMs for a Complex Scalar Field Not Independent?

Milsomonk
Messages
100
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


Find the equations of motion for the Lagrangian below:

$$ L=\partial_\mu \phi^* \partial^\mu \phi - V( \phi,\phi^* ) $$
Where :
$$ V( \phi,\phi^* )= m^2 \phi^* \phi + \lambda (\phi^* \phi)^2 $$

Homework Equations


Euler Lagrange equation:

$$ \partial_\mu \dfrac {\partial L} {\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} -\dfrac {\partial L} {\partial \phi} =0 $$

The Attempt at a Solution


So I have calculated the equations of motion for each field but I'm surprised to find they're not independant of each other so I'm wondering if I've made a mistake somewhere? Here are my workings:

$$ \dfrac {\partial L} {\partial \phi} =m^2 \phi^* +2\lambda (\phi^*)^2 \phi $$
$$\dfrac {\partial L} {\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} = \partial_\mu \phi^* $$
So then the equations of motion are:
$$\Box \phi^* -m^2 \phi^* +2\lambda (\phi^*)^2 \phi =0$$
$$\Box \phi -m^2 \phi +2\lambda (\phi)^2 \phi^* =0$$

Any suggestions would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Milsomonk said:
So then the equations of motion are:
$$\Box \phi^* -m^2 \phi^* +2\lambda (\phi^*)^2 \phi =0$$
$$\Box \phi -m^2 \phi +2\lambda (\phi)^2 \phi^* =0$$
Looks like a sign error in one of the terms on the left. Otherwise, I think it's OK.

You are right that the fields are not independent. They are interacting with one another.
 
Ahh yeah I see the issue, thanks :) Yeah I just thought it was odd as one of the tutorial helpers said they were independent... but they were clearly incorrect. Thanks for your insight :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top