Why are there two different forms of the 1st law of thermodynamics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the two forms of the first law of thermodynamics: Eth = W + Q and Eth = Q - W. The difference lies in the definition of work (W) as either work done by the system or work done on the system, which affects the sign used in the equations. The first equation is more general, while the second accounts for the work done by the system when heat is added. Understanding these definitions helps reconcile the apparent discrepancy between the two forms. Ultimately, the variations stem from differing conventions in defining work in thermodynamic contexts.
najma
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi everyone, in 2 of my physics books the 1st law of thermodynamics is stated in 2 different ways:
I am unsure why these are stated in 2 different forms. Here is what I think:

Homework Equations


1. Eth=W+Q
2. Eth=Q-W

The Attempt at a Solution


2. takes into consideration the fact that when heat is added to a system then the system does work on the surroundings. for example in a cylinder filled with gas and covered with a piston: when heat is added (temperature increases therefore the internal energy also increases, this causes the piston to move up by dx and since there is a force exerted on the system (in the opposite direction dx) work becomes negative. hence, w=-pdV. therefore the first law becomes Q-W.
1. equation is a more general form the law and it doesn't take into consideration the sign of work.

Is this the right explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some texts use the symbol W to represent work done by the system on the environment. Other books define W as the work done on the system by the environment. These two ways of defining W will generally have the same magnitude but differ in sign.
 
  • Like
Likes najma
So I was partially right then! Thank you TSny!
 
It's a difference in the definition of work. The sign is negative when work is stated as "work done by the system" and the sign is positive when work represents "work done on the system".
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top