B Why are two cellophane tapes attracted when ripped apart?

AI Thread Summary
When two strips of cellophane tape are pulled apart, they repel due to the transfer of electrons, resulting in both strips becoming charged. Stacking the tape and then ripping it off the table leads to the top piece acquiring a positive charge while the bottom retains a negative charge, suggesting uneven electron transfer. The phenomenon may be explained by the varying amounts of charge removed from the sticky and non-sticky sides during the ripping process. The discussion also touches on the historical context of similar experiments and the complexities of molecular interactions in charge distribution. Further investigation into the potential capacitor-like behavior of the tape when stuck together is suggested for deeper understanding.
UseAsDirected
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I put two strips of cellophane tape adjacent to each other adhered onto a table. When I pull them both apart, they repel each other, both insulators ripped electrons from the wood.

When I stack two strips of tape on top of each other on a table, rip the combined bundle off the table, my experiment shows that the combined piece is negatively charged on each side. Yet, when I then rip this combined piece into its two constituents pieces, they attract to each other, the top piece immediately becomes positive, the bottom piece retains its negativity. This last step is not immediately obvious to me.

The best answer I can come up with is that more charged is ripped of the bottom sticky cellophane side from the table but less is ripped off from the top cellophane side from the non-stick bottom cellophane side, giving a net positive charge to the top cellophane tape and net negative to the bottom cellophane tape. Is that right? I draw the ideas on paper but there is always a handy-wavy gap of knowledge about how the charges distribute one step to the other. People draw these stacks as net positive and net negative yet I draw layers of positive and negative.

P.S. When I pull two stacked pieces of tape off of a table, do the negative charges equally distribute?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your question is a good one. Doing actual experiments, observing the results and cutthroat about the cause of the results is the scientific method.

Unfortunately, I don't know the specific answer to your question. There were many experiments like yours, especially in the 18th century. When rubbed, some materials become positively charged while others become negatively charged. Analysis of the details depends on molecular level interactions. In most cases, we don't even know which molecules are involved. Such is the case with your tape. I don't enter know what molecules are in the tape glue.

This Wikipedia article may help. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_charge#Electrification_by_friction. The article discusses the triboelectric effect caused by friction when two materials are rubbed. But it is not clear if that is what happens when you pull tape off.

I hope that another PF member can give a better answer.
 
Okay, thank you. Printed that out, looking forward to some other responses.
 
UseAsDirected said:
I draw the ideas on paper but there is always a handy-wavy gap of knowledge about how the charges distribute one step to the other.

One thing to investigate is whether the two pieces of tape can function as a capacitor when stuck together - i.e is the presumed negative charge on them unequally distributed even before you pull them apart.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top