Why Can Tangential Acceleration Vector's Scalar Component Not Be Negative?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the tangential acceleration vector and its scalar component, which is always positive when aligned with the direction of velocity. It contrasts with centripetal acceleration, which has a negative scalar component directed toward the center of the circular path. The tangential unit vector is defined to always follow the direction of the velocity, leading to confusion about why its scalar component cannot be negative. When speed decreases, the tangential acceleration can be negative, indicating deceleration, but the scalar component remains positive in the context of its direction. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector definitions and their directional relationships in physics.
mike 2012
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
we already know that the scalar component of the Centripetal ( Radial ) Acceleration vector is always negative because it's ALWAYS directed to the opposite direction of its unit vector ( toward the center of the circle ) , and this is satisfying to me and to the formula .

however , when it comes to the scalar component of the Tangential Acceleration vector , I get confused because its formula always gives positive outputs . which means it's always directed to the same direction of its unit vector .

the question is : why can the scalar component of the Tangential Acceleration vector not be negative and directed to the opposite direction of its unit vector ?

if it can be negative and directed to the opposite direction of its unit vector , why does not the formula satisfy negative outputs ?

http://imageshack.us/scaled/landing/26/hhhhjz.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi Mike, welcome to PF. :smile:

The tangential unit vector points always in the same direction as the velocity: it is defined as the velocity vector divided by the magnitude of velocity. If the speed increases, the tangential acceleration is positive. In case of decreasing speed, the tangential acceleration is negative.
In the equation you quoted |v| is the speed, and d|v|/dt can be both positive and negative.

ehild
 


ehild said:
The tangential unit vector points always in the same direction as the velocity


is this correct only for " the tangential unit vector " ?
because according to what I learned , any vector can be in the opposite direction of its unit vector and specified by a negative sign.

however , in case of " the tangential unit vector " , as I understood from you ; the unit vector follows the direction of the vector ( wether it's acceleration or velocity as you mentioned ) which means whatever the tangential vector is , it's positive (since its unit vector follows its direction )

and thank you for responding :)
 
Last edited:


The direction of tangential unit vector is the same as that of the velocity. So the velocity is always positive in the coordinate system defined by radial and tangential unit vectors, moving together with the body. The body can accelerate along the tangent in the direction of the velocity, then the magnitude of the velocity will increase; or it can accelerate in the opposite direction (the acceleration is negative, the body decelerates), the magnitude of velocity will decrease.
Imagine a car traveling along a circular rod. It starts from rest and accelerates - its velocity and tangential acceleration are of the same direction, the tangential acceleration is positive with respect to the direction of travel. Suddenly a deer jumps out on the road, so the driver has to brake. Now the acceleration is opposite to the direction of travel, it is negative, as the car has to slow down.

ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top