Why Can't the Positive Cone Be a Submanifold in R^3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pietjuh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone
Pietjuh
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
For a homework assignment i was asked to proof that the positive cone {x^2 + y^2 = z^2, z>= 0} cannot be a submanifold of any dimension of R^3.

It apparently goes wrong at the origin. I guess it's because you can't really speak of a tangent space at that point. So I tried to prove by contradiction you can't have a tangent space at that point. But I couldn't really arrive at a contradiction :confused:

Could someone give me a hint? :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pietjuh said:
For a homework assignment i was asked to proof that the positive cone {x^2 + y^2 = z^2, z>= 0} cannot be a submanifold of any dimension of R^3.
It apparently goes wrong at the origin. I guess it's because you can't really speak of a tangent space at that point. So I tried to prove by contradiction you can't have a tangent space at that point. But I couldn't really arrive at a contradiction :confused:
Could someone give me a hint? :smile:
Try finding an equation for a tangent plane at the origin. That's the only thing I can think of (which is basically what you already had in mind!)

Alex
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top