Why centripetal force does not increase the value of tangent

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal force is defined as being perpendicular to tangential velocity, which means it alters the direction of the velocity but not its magnitude. This principle explains why centripetal force does not increase tangential velocity; it only affects the path of motion. While vectors can be decomposed into components, the components of centripetal force that are perpendicular to tangential velocity do not contribute to changes in speed. An example is a car on a winding road, where the speed remains constant despite changes in direction. Thus, centripetal force maintains the same tangential velocity while changing the direction of motion.
Sbr:132
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
2Mpk3.png
]
I found in a textbook that the value does not change because the centripetal force is perpendicular to the tangential velocity.

But I am confused, because a vector can have a component, which is perpendicular to the vector.
So if the centripetal force is perpendicular to the tangential velocity, the component of the centripetal force which
is perpendicular to the centripetal force and
_parallel_ to the tangential velocity is reasonable.so according to that centripetal force can increase the value of tangential velocity.I need help.I have searched everywhere but have not got the answer.
2Mpk3.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By definition, centripetal force is perpendicular to velocity, so it changes the velocities direction but not the speed. For example, consider a car traveling at constant speed on a winding road, the direction changes, but not the speed.
 
rcgldr said:
By definition, centripetal force is perpendicular to velocity, so it changes the velocities direction but not the speed. For example, consider a car traveling at constant speed on a winding road, the direction changes, but not the speed.
I know the definition but I want to know why?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sbr:132 said:
a vector can have a component, which is perpendicular to the vector.
You can decompose a vector into multiple vectors, which have non-zero components perpendicular to the original vector. But those components cancel each other out, so they have no net effect.
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top