Why choose /100 over x100?Why Divide by 100 when solving decibels?

  • Thread starter Thread starter silversurf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decibels Intensity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how to calculate the decrease in sound intensity when the intensity level drops by 20 decibels. The correct approach involves recognizing that a 20 dB decrease corresponds to a reduction in intensity by a factor of 100, leading to a new intensity of 2 Watts per meter squared from an original 200 Watts per meter squared. This is derived from the logarithmic relationship between decibels and intensity, where a decrease in dB translates to a multiplicative change in intensity. The confusion arises from misinterpreting the relationship between decibels and intensity, as the decrease should not be treated as a simple subtraction. Ultimately, the observed intensity after the decrease is 198 Watts per meter squared.
silversurf
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm having difficulty understanding the solution to this question. "A source creates a sound that is observed at 200 Watts per meter squared. If the intensity level of the observed sound decreases by 20 decibels what is the decrease in observed intensity?

The way I solved it was I saw 20 decibels as a decrease in intensity of 100 so I subtracted 100 from 200 to get 100 Watts per meter squared but the solution divides 200 by 100 and then subtracts this from the original number: 200 - 2 = 198. Why do they solve it like this and not the way I did?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
silversurf said:
I'm having difficulty understanding the solution to this question. "A source creates a sound that is observed at 200 Watts per meter squared. If the intensity level of the observed sound decreases by 20 decibels what is the decrease in observed intensity?

The way I solved it was I saw 20 decibels as a decrease in intensity of 100 so I subtracted 100 from 200 to get 100 Watts per meter squared but the solution divides 200 by 100 and then subtracts this from the original number: 200 - 2 = 198. Why do they solve it like this and not the way I did?

Hi silversuf, 20dB is a decrease in intensity of 100 times. Therefore, the intensity level of the observed sound is 1/100 times that of the original sound.
20(dB)=-10~log_{10} \frac{I_{new}}{I_{original}}
\frac{I_{new}}{I_{original}}=10^{-2}
I_{new}=10^{-2} I_{original}=10^{-2} \times 200 W/m^2=2W/m^2
Hence the decrease in observed intensity = (200-2) W/m^2 =198W/m^2
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Good day,

The sound level in decibels is

β = 10log_{10}(\frac{I}{I_0})

Where beta is measured n decibels, I the intensity in question and I_0 is the reference intensity. Since you have a decrease of 20 decibels in your reference intensity (the source), you may re-write the above equation as

20 = 10log_{10}(I_{0}) - 10log_{10}(I)

multiplying by -1 in both sides of the equation and using the laws of logarithms,

-20 = 10log_{10}(\frac{I}{I_0})

the -20 can be thought of as -β in the above expression, indicating that this is a decrease in sound level with respect to the reference intensity. For solving the difference in the observed intensity, you will have to solve for I and subtract this number from the reference intensity.

P.S. I think this post should be in the Homework & Coursework Questions area.

Cheers.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you both so much!
 
silversurf said:
I'm having difficulty understanding the solution to this question. "A source creates a sound that is observed at 200 Watts per meter squared. If the intensity level of the observed sound decreases by 20 decibels what is the decrease in observed intensity?

The way I solved it was I saw 20 decibels as a decrease in intensity of 100 so I subtracted 100 from 200 to get 100 Watts per meter squared but the solution divides 200 by 100 and then subtracts this from the original number: 200 - 2 = 198. Why do they solve it like this and not the way I did?

To get a feel for a question like this I rely on a couple of reference examples.

#1
Halving or doubling the intensity means a 3 dB change (halving -3dB, doubling +3dB)
This is supposedly the smallest change the average human can notice - meaning that if the sound level went from 90dB to 91dB not many people would notice apparently

#2
Changing the intensity by a factor of 10 means a change of 10dB - I just like that both figures are 10, the only time the factor change in Intensity = the dB change in Sound level.

To get a 20dB change, you just have to have a 10dB change, then a second 10dB change.

The first means the intensity is down by a factor of 10 (from 200 to 20) and the second means another factor of 10 (from 20 to 2)

SO the intensity has changed from 200 to 2 ; a change of 198.

Perhaps more simply: dB changes are additions and subtractions, intensity changes a factor changes.

so 20dB change was +20dB or -20dB, The intensity change of 100 was x100 or /100.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top