Why Did They Add 2π When Shifting AC Circuits?

cosine
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I ran into the following little problem:

Homework Statement


Given v=40 cos(100*pi*t + pi/3), the question is:
what is the minimum number of millisec that the function must be shifted to the left if the expression for v is 40 cos(100*pi*t)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


ok, I started with:
40 cos(100*pi*(t+t0) + pi/3) = 40 cos(100*pi*t)
hence 100*pi*(t+t0) + pi/3 = 100*pi*t
the 100*pi*t cancels out on each side and we can solve for t0 but t0 < 0

BUT the book starts with:
40 cos(100*pi*(t+t0) + pi/3) = 40 cos(100*pi*t + 2pi)
and they solved for t0... and t0 is now > 0

My question why they added the 2pi! Although the more I think about it the more it makes sense to me but I'd like to be sure... Is it because we look for the min time but still positive?
If that's the case, what bothers me is: how are we supposed to know ahead of time to add this '2pi'?

Thanks for your answer(s) o:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the answer is that they said "shift the function to the left" implying a positive time shift was being looked for.
 
Dick said:
I think the answer is that they said "shift the function to the left" implying a positive time shift was being looked for.

Oh my god... you are right, I can't believe I didn't think of it this way... That totally makes sense !:biggrin:

Thx
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top