Why do magnetic fields follow the right-hand rule instead of the left-hand rule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hymne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of magnetic fields generated by electric currents and their directional properties. It highlights that while the right-hand rule is a convention for determining magnetic field direction, it does not reflect an inherent asymmetry in nature. The conversation touches on the idea of orientability and questions whether this asymmetry has significant consequences. Additionally, it notes that the Lorentz force law maintains symmetry in the resultant forces, regardless of the chosen convention. Ultimately, the nature of magnetic fields and their orientation remains a topic of exploration in physics.
Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
If a conductor connects your nose with the computerscreen with electricity going through it (allways in the same direction), the magnetic fieldlines will allways surround the conductor with one direction. Obviously nature prefers one direction more than the other.
Is there some very important consequenses of this asymmetri, and does it got a name?

I can more physics and english that it looks like in this post, so don't be shy with terms and other stuff.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Orientability"? Except... doesn't the Lorentz law cancel any consequence?
 
So you're wondering why magnetic fields orient themselves via the right-hand rule (as opposed to the left hand rule)?

The direction of the magnetic field is a mad-made convention, and not one enforced by nature (i.e. we could reverse all our conventions and still be consistent with nature). The effect of the field though (i.e. the resultant forces) retain the symmetry of the problem, the force in the case of a wire for example will always be directed either radially inward or outward.

Claude.
 
Back
Top