Why do positive charges not move in a conductor?

AI Thread Summary
Positive charges in a conductor, which are essentially the atomic nuclei, do not move; only electrons are free to move. When a negatively charged rod is brought near a neutral metallic sphere, electrons redistribute, leaving a net positive charge on the sphere after grounding. Conversely, when a positively charged rod approaches, electrons are attracted to it, causing charge separation, and grounding allows additional electrons to neutralize the positive charge. The confusion arises from the concept that while positive charges themselves don't move, the absence of electrons creates a net positive charge in other areas of the conductor. Ultimately, the movement of electrons leads to the observed charge distributions, not the movement of positive charges.
lha08
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a question that has been puzzling me: I know that when we bring a negatively charged rod close to a neutral metallic sphere, the negative charges are distributed to the opposite side of the sphere because of the negatively charged rod and the positive charges remain stationary (they did not move). When we attach it to the ground, some of the electron charges leave through the ground wire, leaving a positive charge on the sphere and the electrons readily redistribute themselves.

Now here is my problem: When we bring a positively charged rod towards a neutral metallic sphere, there is a charge separation (the electrons are brought towards the positive rod and the positive charges in the sphere are repelled to the other side. When we attach the sphere to the ground, the positive charges are then neutralized, leaving only electrons that distribute themselves.

I thought that only electrons are free to move and NOT protons? I don't understand why the second case underwent a charge separation and the first case did not...maybe I'm misunderstanding but maybe both cases actually undergo a charged separation?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lha08 said:

Homework Statement


I have a question that has been puzzling me: I know that when we bring a negatively charged rod close to a neutral metallic sphere, the negative charges are distributed to the opposite side of the sphere because of the negatively charged rod and the positive charges remain stationary (they did not move). When we attach it to the ground, some of the electron charges leave through the ground wire, leaving a positive charge on the sphere and the electrons readily redistribute themselves.
In which case there is a deficit of negative charges in the conductor when you break the contact to the Earth with the rod still in place. This makes the originally neutral conductor have a net positive charge.

Now here is my problem: When we bring a positively charged rod towards a neutral metallic sphere, there is a charge separation (the electrons are brought towards the positive rod and the positive charges in the sphere are repelled to the other side.
No. The only positive charges in the conductor are the nuclei and they are not free to move.
When we attach the sphere to the ground, the positive charges are then neutralized, leaving only electrons that distribute themselves.
When you attach the sphere to the ground, more electrons from the Earth are free to move closer to the positively charged rod which brings an excess of negative charges on the sphere. When you remove the ground (with the rod still in place) the negative charges are trapped so when you remove the rod, the sphere has a net negative charge.
 
kuruman said:
No. The only positive charges in the conductor are the nuclei and they are not free to move.

When you attach the sphere to the ground, more electrons from the Earth are free to move closer to the positively charged rod which brings an excess of negative charges on the sphere. When you remove the ground (with the rod still in place) the negative charges are trapped so when you remove the rod, the sphere has a net negative charge.

But do the positive charge redistribute themselves when the negative rod is removed because I thought that positive charges do not move. In one textbook, it says that they do not move but in my other textbook, it physically shows the positive charges redistributing themselves when the negative rod is removed...that is confusing me...
 
Positive charges do not move. Consider a conductor that is initially neutrally charged. If a volume element within the conductor loses negative charges, it acquires a net positive charge and some other volume element in the conductor acquires a net negative charge; if the volume element gains net negative charge, some other part of the conductor acquires a net positive charge. The motion of negative charges within the conductor creates "absences" of negative charge (i.e. a positive charge) in other parts of the conductor. What moves inside a conductor is not the positive charges, but the absence of negative charges, if you can imagine that. That's probably what your other textbook is (should be) trying to illustrate.

I hope I did not confuse you, but the matter is a bit confusing.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top