Why Do We Keep the 2x(hat) for E3?

Marcin H
Messages
306
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Screen Shot 2017-09-23 at 7.25.46 PM.png


Screen Shot 2017-09-25 at 3.45.49 PM.png


Find E1, E3, and ps2

Homework Equations


boundary conditions

The Attempt at a Solution



(these are class notes)[/B]
I understand how to find E1, but I am a bit confused about the reasoning behind finding E3... Why do we leave the 2x(hat) for E3...? I though that only tangential components of E don't change across a charge density, but the normal does change which is why we have to use boundary conditions and n (dot) (D1-D2)... But we don't have ps here so we can't use that. Why do we keep the 2x(hat)? I get the y(hat) and z(hat) part because they are tangential, but not the x(hat).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement that you posted is somewhat unconventional. Can you clarify it using a few more English words?
 
kuruman said:
The problem statement that you posted is somewhat unconventional. Can you clarify it using a few more English words?
I figured it out. I was in a hurry and forgot to explain the problem at the top. Sorry bout that!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top