Why do we need to wear goggles underwater to see straight

  • Thread starter Thread starter thisisbryant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Underwater
AI Thread Summary
Wearing goggles underwater is necessary to see clearly due to the phenomenon of refraction. Water and corneal tissue have similar indices of refraction, which means light does not focus properly on the retina when submerged. Without goggles, the light entering the eye is distorted, leading to blurry vision. Goggles create an air pocket in front of the eyes, allowing light to refract correctly, improving clarity. Understanding this optical principle highlights the importance of goggles for clear underwater vision.
thisisbryant
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a question i know it has something to do with refraction but uh... why do we need to wear goggles underwater to see straight>??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
water and corneal tissue have about the same indices of refraction so light isn't as focused by the time it reaches the retina, as it would be after traveling through air first
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top