Why do we study right triangles in trigonometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avichal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Triangles
AI Thread Summary
Right triangles are fundamental in trigonometry because they simplify calculations and concepts, allowing for the derivation of sine and cosine functions. Any triangle can be divided into two right triangles, making them easier to analyze. The relationship between right triangles and the unit circle provides a clear correlation with grid coordinates, enhancing usability. While other angles can be used, they complicate calculations and require additional tables or approximations. Overall, right triangle trigonometry is efficient and foundational for understanding broader trigonometric principles.
Avichal
Messages
294
Reaction score
0
Why do we study so much about right triangles like trigonometry. We could define sin and cos like functions in a 70 degree triangle too.
I also know right triangle is something special but i don't know what is it. Also why won't trigonometry on other type of triangles be not so good
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Because right-angled triangles are simplest to start out with.
Furthermore, trigonometry based on that is sufficient to handle all questions you would like to ask non-right-angled triangles, as well. Thus, developing other types of plane trigonometry is unnecessary and a waste of time.
 
If you find yourself working with a lot of 70 degree triangles, or any other number of degrees for that matter, feel free to make a trig table based on that if you feel it will save you time.

Right triangles are preferable as the basis for trigonometry because any other triangle can be cut into two right triangles, by drawing a line through one vertex perpendicular to its opposite side. While you could, in this day and age of analytic geometry, draw a 70 degree angled line just as well as a perpendicular, the two triangles you got from that would have one with a 70 degree angle and the other with a 110 degree angle. So, you would need two trig tables to sort it all out (or a messy set of successive approximations).

Also, when you get to unit circle trig (if you haven't already), the right triangle definition correlates with the coordinates of a point on a grid in a way that is very neat and easy to see and use. You could come up with a formula based on other angles, but it would be much messier and harder to use.
 
sin and cos have not so much to do with triangles, they are the coordinates of points on the circle. the right triangles come in because the coordinate axes are perpendicular to each other.

The reason we use perpendicular axes, or right triangle trig, is the pythagorean theorem. The pythagorean theorem for other triangles is called the law of cosines and is more complicated.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top