Why do we *subtract* enthelpy of lattice formation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aleksbooker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formation Lattice
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the calculation of the enthalpy of lattice formation using the Born-Haber process. Participants explain that while most enthalpies in the process are added, the enthalpy of lattice formation is subtracted because it represents the energy released when gaseous ions form a solid lattice, which is a product of the reaction. The question arises about how NaF can be considered to exist before the formation process, leading to clarification that NaF is the final product, and its formation from ions requires energy input, hence the subtraction. The logic of the sequence of states from solid to gas and ionization is acknowledged, but the key point remains that the lattice formation is an exothermic process that releases energy. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurately applying the Born-Haber cycle in thermodynamic calculations.
aleksbooker
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I'm in gen chem 2 and we're going over how to calculate the enthalpy of lattice formation. The way given is to use the Born-Haber process and add the enthalpies of all the steps in between.

e.g. Na_{(s)} --> Na^+_{(g)} + e^- (388kJ)

There are three or four of these, and we combine (add) them to find the enthalpy of reaction. I know how to *do* the problem, subtracting for both sides to determine the value of the missing variable. Here's where I'm confused:

Why is it that everything else is added, and only enthalpy of lattice formation is subtracted?

(enthalpy of sublimation of sodium) + (enthalpy of sodium ionization) + (enthalpy of fluorine atom formation?) + (enthalpy of fluorine ion formation) - (enthalpy of lattice formation) = enthalpy of sodium fluoride reaction

That fourth operation, why is it subtraction and not addition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically NaF already exists before the solid is formed.
 
@Borek, you mean we subtract NaF because it already exists?

I don't understand what that means. Are we removing it from the sequence?

As far as I understand, it proceeds logically: solid sodium becomes gaseous sodium becomes ionized sodium gas, while diatomic fluorine gas becomes monatomic fluorine gas becomes ionized fluorine gas, and then ionized sodium gas combines with ionized fluorine gas to form a lattice (which requires enthalpy of lattice energy) which becomes sodium fluoride gas (NaF). How does NaF exist before going through this process?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top