Why do we take component of v1 along the string in Newton's laws homework?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between the velocities of two objects connected by a string over a pulley, specifically focusing on why the component of velocity v1 is taken along the string rather than v2 along the plank. It is established that the string length remains constant, leading to the conclusion that the velocities on both sides of the pulley must be equal. The differentiation of the string's length with respect to time reveals that v2 is equal to v1 multiplied by cos(theta), indicating that v1 must be greater than v2 to account for the slack in the string. The confusion arises from the incorrect assumption that v2 can be expressed in terms of v1 using cos(theta), which leads to contradictions in their relationship. Ultimately, the correct approach emphasizes the need to analyze the velocities along the direction of the string for accurate results.
Faris Shajahan
Messages
29
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Capture.JPG


Homework Equations


None...
Newton's laws

The Attempt at a Solution


Not the attempt, the entire solution is:
String length is constant...hence if on the right side of the pulley, the string goes up by x distance then on the right side also the string goes down by x distance. Differentiating, we get velocity of string is equal on both sides. Now taking component of ## v_1 ## along the string we get ##v_1cos\theta=v_2##!

But my doubt is instead, why don't we take component of ##v_2## along the plank and write ##v_2cos\theta=v_1## ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Faris Shajahan said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 79511

Homework Equations


None...
Newton's laws

The Attempt at a Solution


Not the attempt, the entire solution is:
String length is constant...hence if on the right side of the pulley, the string goes up by x distance then on the right side also the string goes down by x distance. Differentiating, we get velocity of string is equal on both sides. Now taking component of ## v_1 ## along the string we get ##v_1cos\theta=v_2##!

But my doubt is instead, why don't we take component of ##v_2## along the plank and write ##v_2cos\theta=v_1## ?

Since the length of string is a constant. The decrease in length on the right side, must be equal to the increase in length on the left side.

You want to know the rate at which the hypotenuse of the right triangle on the left side is increasing, for a constant velocity in the x direction.

I.e. L = SQRT (x^2 + y^2). If v1 = dx/dt, dy/dt = 0, what is dL/dt? This (dL/dt) must be equal to v2.
 
Quantum Defect said:
Since the length of string is a constant. The decrease in length on the right side, must be equal to the increase in length on the left side.

You want to know the rate at which the hypotenuse of the right triangle on the left side is increasing, for a constant velocity in the x direction.

I.e. L = SQRT (x^2 + y^2). If v1 = dx/dt, dy/dt = 0, what is dL/dt? This (dL/dt) must be equal to v2.
Thanks! But what is wrong when we write ## v_2cos\theta=v_1 ##??
 
Faris Shajahan said:
Thanks! But what is wrong when we write ## v_2cos\theta=v_1 ##??

L = sqrt(x^2 + y^2)

dL/dt = 1/2* 1/sqrt(x^2 + y^2) * (2x*dx/dt + 2y*dy/dt) [dx/dt = v1, dy/dt = 0] ==> dL/dt = [x/sqrt(x^2 _ y^2)]*v1 = cos(theta) * v1

When you differentiate L (above) w.r.t. time you get dL/dt = cos(theta)*v1. Setting this equal to v2 gives you: v2 = cos(theta) * v1

Another way to think about this is that all of v2 goes into shortening the length of the string on the right side, but you need to have the ball move faster than v2 to take up the slack that is produced by the shortening of the right side. I.e. v1 = v2/cos(theta) ==> v1> v2
 
##v_2\cos(\theta)## would give you the horizontal component of v₂ but you need the component of the velocity of the ball along the rope, not the same thing!
as Quantum defect pointed out if you say ##v_2\cos\theta = v_1## ##\cos\theta =[-1,+1]## so v₂will always be more than v₁by this equation which is wrong.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
925
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top