Why Does a 0.30 Coefficient Yield a 3.25 m/s² Acceleration Calculation Error?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum acceleration of a cup of coffee on a table in an accelerating airplane, given a static friction coefficient of 0.30. The initial calculation yielded an acceleration of 2.94 m/s², but the expected answer is 3.25 m/s². Participants noted that the discrepancy may arise from a misunderstanding of the coefficient of static friction, suggesting that a coefficient of 0.33 could yield the correct acceleration. Additionally, it was mentioned that static friction can exceed the calculated value briefly before decreasing, which could explain the difference. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the principles of friction and acceleration in physics calculations.
helen3743
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A cup of coffee is sitting on a table in an airplane that is flying at a constant altitude and a constant velocity. The coefficient of static friction between the cup and the table is 0.30. Suddenly, the plane accelerates, its altitude remaining constant. What is the maximum acceleration that the plane can have without the cup sliding backward on the table?

I got 2.94 m/s^2 as my answer, but the answer is supposed to be 3.25 m/s^2.

This is how I did it:
Fsmax = (funny looking symbol for coefficient of static friction)*FN
FN = mg
Fsmax = (symbol for coefficient of static friction)*mg = ma

amax = ((symbol for coefficient of static friction)*mg)/m
amax = (symbol for coefficient of static friction*g
amax = 0.30 * 9.8 = 2.94 m/s^2

What did I do wrong?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Who says the answer is suppose to be 3.25 m\cdot s^{-2}? I can't see anything wrong with your working.
 
Your method and answer look OK to me.

[Hootenanny's getting faster!]
 
This might bring some light.

Force of friction is based on the normal force of the object.

The airplane accelerates, a force ===> in that direction.

The Force of Friction is <===== that direction.

The only way to get 3.25 is when the coefficient is .33 but I remember that static friction exceeds a little bit more then goes down if you look at a graph. O_o
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top