Why Does a Ball Stay Stationary in a High-Speed Air Stream?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of a ball in a high-speed air stream, exploring why it remains stationary despite the airflow. Theories suggest that Bernoulli's Principle might explain the lift and balance of forces, but there is disagreement on the ball's spin direction and its implications. One viewpoint argues that the ball's clockwise spin generates lift, while the opposing view claims that a counterclockwise spin would lead to downward force, challenging the application of Bernoulli's Principle. It is noted that viscous effects complicate the scenario, indicating that Navier-Stokes equations may be more appropriate for analysis. Ultimately, the complexities of fluid dynamics necessitate numerical simulations to accurately assess the situation.
Darkalyan
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This isn't a homework question, but more like a theory question that my teacher and I are having trouble figuring out. We're trying to figure out why this ball, more or less, stays still in a high speed stream of air:

http://laserpablo.com/videos/videofiles/Bernoulli.htm


Homework Equations


Bernoulli's Principle, gravity, balancing vector diagrams.


The Attempt at a Solution


The stream of air is going from the bottom/left to the top/right, and we had a couple theories. I think the ball is spinning clockwise, and bernoulli's is causing a lift perpendicular to the stream. The force of gravity is acting down, and the reason there isn't a net movement to the left is because the stream itself pushes the ball to the right. Therefore, the forces cancel out and the ball, more or less, stays still. However, my professor thinks the ball is actually spinning counterclockwise, and in that case Bernoulli's wouldn't explain why the ball is floating in midair; it would actually cause the ball to be pushed downward, correct? Is there something we're missing here? What're your thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only thing I know that I can say about it is that Bernoulli's doesn't actually apply because of all kinds of viscous effects, but instead you'd have to apply the momentum equation (one of the navier-stokes equations) and also/alternatively you could apply the energy equation, but you definitely can't use Bernoulli because of the presence of viscous boundary layers around the ball. Navier-stokes would be able to tell you what is going on since they are partial differential vector equations, but in order to use those navier-stokes equations you'd really have to run a computer simulation and numerically evaluate the equations because of the inherit complexity of those partial derivatives.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top