Why does a moment have more than one part?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1question
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment
AI Thread Summary
A moment can be expressed as having two components derived from a single force, which together contribute to the net moment. These components are essentially the moments generated by the decomposed vectors of the force. Each force does not inherently have two moments in opposite directions; rather, the decomposition simplifies calculations. The sum of these individual moments results in the overall net moment. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurate mechanical analysis.
1question
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question 1-4 from here http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~htippur/mech3130/hw-1-solutions-2012.pdf

My question is why exactly does the moment have 2 parts from 1 force? Are those simply the components which together make up the net moment? Does each force always have 2 moments in opposite directions?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I think that the sum of the two moments makes the net moment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1question said:

Homework Statement



Question 1-4 from here http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~htippur/mech3130/hw-1-solutions-2012.pdf

My question is why exactly does the moment have 2 parts from 1 force? Are those simply the components which together make up the net moment? Does each force always have 2 moments in opposite directions?

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



I think that the sum of the two moments makes the net moment.

It's not clear what you mean when you say a moment has 2 parts. Could you specifically point out these parts?
 
SteamKing said:
It's not clear what you mean when you say a moment has 2 parts. Could you specifically point out these parts?

I guess I mean the components of the moment, aka -80sin45(0.1+0.3sin30) AND 80cos45(0.3cos30).

I just want to make sure that thinking of them as components of the moment, and that their sum is the net moment, is correct.
Thanks
 
The 80 N force is decomposed into two vectors and moments of both vectors are added, it makes calculations easier.
 
szynkasz said:
The 80 N force is decomposed into two vectors and moments of both vectors are added, it makes calculations easier.

That is more or less what I figured, but I wanted to make sure. Thank you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top