Why does a sleeping top resist torques and return to its original position?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torques
AI Thread Summary
A spinning top resists small perturbations due to its angular momentum, which maintains its vertical axis during rotation. When a small torque is applied, it does not cause precession because the torque acts briefly and the top's angular momentum seeks to return to its original state. This behavior is similar to a football following a parabolic trajectory, where disturbances are corrected to maintain alignment. The principle at work is the conservation of angular momentum, which dictates that the top must adjust its orientation to counteract the perturbation. Ultimately, the top's design and physics ensure it returns to the vertical position after minor disturbances.
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
Hello Forum,

a sleeping top, rotating fast on its vertical axis, will resist small perturbation, small torque that try to move the rotation axis away from the vertical: if the top is moved a small angle away from the vertical, it will act so that the axis quickly returns to the vertical position?
Why?

The small perturbation, small torque does not cause precession. Why? Is it because the perturbative torque only acts for a very short time and then disappears?

Still, why does the top manage to return to the vertical position?

A football tracking the parabolic trajectory responds the same way: the slight disturbance is such that the spinning ball, starting with zero initial torque, wants to maintain the zero initial torque condition and so moves its axis to align it to the trajectory.

What is the main principle that explains why there is this action by the football or spinning top?

thanks
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fisico30 said:
Hello Forum,

a sleeping top, rotating fast on its vertical axis, will resist small perturbation, small torque that try to move the rotation axis away from the vertical: if the top is moved a small angle away from the vertical, it will act so that the axis quickly returns to the vertical position?
Why?

The small perturbation, small torque does not cause precession. Why? Is it because the perturbative torque only acts for a very short time and then disappears?

Still, why does the top manage to return to the vertical position?

A football tracking the parabolic trajectory responds the same way: the slight disturbance is such that the spinning ball, starting with zero initial torque, wants to maintain the zero initial torque condition and so moves its axis to align it to the trajectory.

What is the main principle that explains why there is this action by the football or spinning top?
Can you draw the angular momentum vector for the spinning top before perturbation and after perturbation? Can you draw the torque vector for the perturbing torque and the angular momentum that it imparts to the spinning top? How does it compare in magnitude to the total momentum?

In order to conserve the angular momentum prior to perturbation, what must the top do in response to the perturbing torque?

AM
 
Well,
initially both angular velocity and angular momentum point in the same direction (vertically upward).
After perturbation, the angular velocity still points upward while the angular momentum points sideways: they don't point in the same direction...

Now the angular momentum is changing direction as the top rotates after perturbation, i.e. there is a torque (time change of angular momentum)...

Still, I am not sure why the top will tend to return to its original position, the one before perturbation..

thanks
fisico30
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top