Why Does a Wire Melt? | Current & Resistance Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter i.am.lost
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wires
AI Thread Summary
A wire melts when excessive current flows through it, generating heat due to resistance, described by the formula P = I^2/R. The correlation between the current needed to melt a wire and its resistance is that higher resistance leads to more heat generation for a given current. Resistivity is a material property that indicates how much resistance a specific length and cross-sectional area of the wire will have, measured in ohm-metres (Ωm), while resistance is dependent on the wire's dimensions. The melting occurs when the heat produced exceeds the wire's melting point. Understanding these concepts is crucial for experiments involving electrical currents and thermal effects.
i.am.lost
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have been set an experiment of relating to the current needed to melt a wire (predominantly dealing with R = ρL/A). This sounds like a really dumb question (because it is :redface:) but why does the wire melt when too much current is passed through?

Also, what is the correlation between the current that would melt a wire and the wire's resistance? And what the heck is the difference between resistance and resistivity (let me guess, resistivity is a standard measure, whereas resistance is length-dependent??)

Any help would be great. Many thanks you guys, and hope your day is going good.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wire melts due to generated heat (given by P = I^2/R and the heat capacity of the wire) which of course comes from resistance.

Resistivity is just a sort of "resistance density" if you will. In classical physics you have a lot of these "density" type quantities like pressure, density (who'd have thought), etc. It's resistance per unit length, and nothing more - ohms per metre, Ω/m, Ωm^-1, etc, etc. Resistance is length dependant as you say.

A little bit of dimensional analysis goes a long way here.
 
Note that the unit of resistivity is Ohm metre Ωm and not Ω/m.
 
dst said:
Resistivity is just a sort of "resistance density" if you will. In classical physics you have a lot of these "density" type quantities like pressure, density (who'd have thought), etc. It's resistance per unit length, and nothing more - ohms per metre, Ω/m, Ωm^-1, etc, etc. Resistance is length dependant as you say.
It's resistance per unit length, and nothing more - ohms per metre, Ω/m, Ωm^-1, etc, etc.

Not exactly. :smile:

If the resistivity of a wire 2m long and having area of cross-section 1 cm^2 is 5 Ωm, then the resistance is not 5*2 Ω. Resistance will be \frac{5*2}{0.0001}Ω
 
Last edited:
Due to resistance there is a drop in potential. This potential energy is converted into heat energy and if the T reaches the melting point of the wire, it melts!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top