Why Does Calculating Maximum Height in Hooke's Law Give a Negative Value?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jon1NL8796
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height a mass rises when released from a spring's potential energy. Initially, the user calculated the work done on the spring and the maximum speed of the mass using Hooke's Law and energy conservation principles. The confusion arose when attempting to find the maximum height, resulting in a negative value due to incorrect energy balance assumptions. After clarifying that the total energy remains constant in a frictionless environment, the user correctly equated the elastic potential energy to gravitational potential energy. Ultimately, the maximum height was determined to be approximately 1.98 meters.
Jon1NL8796
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey there everyone. First post, so... yeah.

Anywho, I got a few questions on Hooke's law as a homework assignment. But the last one is giving me some trouble. I'll tell what I've done so far that leads up to the problem.

The first question asks to calculate the work done given a Graphical Analysis graph that has force on the y-axis and the elongation of a spring on the x-axis (N/m). I figured out that this would be equal to the area of under the given best fit line, so it was a simple case of using the equation K=(.5)bh, where b is th longest elongation (.084) and h is the corresponding force (5.886). So the equation looks like:

Work = K = (.5)(.084)(5.886)
= .247 J

The next question is to find the maximum speed of the spring when a 150 gram mass is attatched to the end, the spring is stretched to its maximum distance, and then released. I know this dealt with PE elastic and KE. so the equation was:

PE elastic(i) + KE(i) = PE elastic(f) + KE(f)

And since there was no KE initially or PE elastic in the final effect:

PE elastic = KE

So then:

PE elastic = (0.5)kx^2
= (0.5)(69.51)(0.084)^2
= 0.245 J
PE elastic = KE = (0.5)mV^2
0.245 = (0.5)(0.15)V^2
V^2 = 0.245 / ([0.5][0.15])
= 3.27
V = 1.81 m/s

Now here's the final question, which is giving me so much trouble. If the setup from the previous question is rigged to be released vertically at the instant that all of the PE in the spring is transferred to the mass, what will the maximum height the mass rises to be?

I thought that since it involved PEg, PE elastic, and KE, and because there would initially be no KE or PEg or PE elastic in the final result, the equation would look like:

(.5)kx^2 = (.5)mV^2 + mgh

Yet no matter how many times I try to get it to work, I always get h to equal a negative number in the ten-thousanths place. I need help with this desperately, and any assistance given would be greatly appreciated.

Peace out y'all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Initial (at bottom, call h=0):
KE = 0 (not moving)
PEg =0 (h=0)
PEelast=max (x is maximum and equal to h)

Final (at top):
KE=0 (not moving)
PEg =maximum
PEelast= 0 (you can set the "x" to an arbitrary 0, just like "h")

NOw you assume that the total energy of the system remaons constant, and is still equal to what it was before. How much energy was there?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that, I see how I went wrong and fixed the problem.

The questions are supposed to take place in a frictionless enviorment, so there would be no energy loss between the initial and the final. And seeing as the new equation is PE elastic = PEg, and I had already found PE elastic to be .245 J, PEg would be equal to .245 J.

So the steps for the final question looked like this:

.245 = PEg = mgh
= (.15)(9.81)h
h = .245 / ([.15][9.81])
= 1.98 m

Thanks again Chi!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top